PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBC9.DE vs. JGHY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBC9.DE vs. JGHY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IBC9.DE) and JPM Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor Active UCITS ETF USD Acc (JGHY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBC9.DE achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly lower than JGHY.DE's 4.92% return.


IBC9.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
1.22%
6M
2.54%
YTD
3.59%
1Y
5.94%
3Y*
7.03%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
4.00%

JGHY.DE

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.20%
6M
3.93%
YTD
4.92%
1Y
8.73%
3Y*
7.91%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBC9.DE vs. JGHY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IBC9.DE
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
3.59%1.08%9.31%9.25%-6.54%8.55%-2.59%
JGHY.DE
JPM Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor Active UCITS ETF USD Acc
4.92%-0.68%12.22%7.50%-4.77%10.40%-13.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IBC9.DE and JGHY.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2020

0.81

The correlation between IBC9.DE and JGHY.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBC9.DE vs. JGHY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBC9.DE
IBC9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IBC9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBC9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBC9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IBC9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBC9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

JGHY.DE
JGHY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
JGHY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGHY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGHY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
JGHY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGHY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBC9.DE vs. JGHY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IBC9.DE) and JPM Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor Active UCITS ETF USD Acc (JGHY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBC9.DEJGHY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.41

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

4.15

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.68

13.75

-5.07

IBC9.DE vs. JGHY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBC9.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the JGHY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBC9.DE and JGHY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBC9.DE vs. JGHY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBC9.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.22%, which is greater than JGHY.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC9.DE and JGHY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBC9.DEJGHY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.22%

-24.72%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.22%

-2.32%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.79%

-10.49%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.00%

-10.49%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.52%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-6.58%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

0.70%

-0.02%

Volatility

IBC9.DE vs. JGHY.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IBC9.DE) is 1.07%, while JPM Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor Active UCITS ETF USD Acc (JGHY.DE) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that IBC9.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGHY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBC9.DEJGHY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

1.21%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

3.04%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.02%

4.63%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.68%

6.57%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.84%

8.78%

-0.94%

IBC9.DE vs. JGHY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBC9.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JGHY.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBC9.DE vs. JGHY.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBC9.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.99%, while JGHY.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBC9.DE
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
6.99%5.55%5.32%4.88%4.06%3.76%4.80%4.78%4.77%5.03%4.78%5.18%
JGHY.DE
JPM Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor Active UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBC9.DE and JGHY.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JGHY.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JGHY.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBC9.DE.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IBC9.DE and 0.35% for JGHY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBC9.DE and JGHY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer