IBC6.DE vs. LGQK.DE
IBC6.DE (iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF) and LGQK.DE (Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IBC6.DE tracks the MSCI Australia while LGQK.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBC6.DE returned 8.07%/yr vs 11.66%/yr for LGQK.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBC6.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for LGQK.DE.
Performance
IBC6.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBC6.DE achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly higher than LGQK.DE's 9.03% return. Over the past 10 years, IBC6.DE has underperformed LGQK.DE with an annualized return of 8.07%, while LGQK.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.66% annualized return.
IBC6.DE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 12.44%
- 1Y
- 11.70%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
LGQK.DE
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 13.31%
- 3Y*
- 10.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
IBC6.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBC6.DE iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 10.86% | 1.01% | 8.47% | 10.05% | -0.95% | 18.21% | -1.41% | 25.74% | -7.69% | 5.50% |
LGQK.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist | 9.03% | 6.49% | 12.16% | 1.67% | -1.07% | 12.33% | 56.18% | 16.88% | -9.04% | 10.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBC6.DE and LGQK.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014 | 0.91 |
The correlation between IBC6.DE and LGQK.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBC6.DE vs. LGQK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBC6.DE
LGQK.DE
IBC6.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) and Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBC6.DE | LGQK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.20 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.21 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 6.30 | -2.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBC6.DE | LGQK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.14 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.37 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.47 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.55 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
IBC6.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBC6.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.64%, which is greater than LGQK.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC6.DE and LGQK.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBC6.DE | LGQK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.64% | -36.96% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.49% | -6.26% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.12% | -20.04% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | -20.04% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.64% | -36.96% | -6.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -2.16% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -6.18% | -1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.20% | +0.72% |
Volatility
IBC6.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) at 3.20%. This indicates that IBC6.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGQK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBC6.DE | LGQK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 3.20% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 9.32% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.47% | 12.16% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 14.67% | +2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 25.08% | -5.77% |
IBC6.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBC6.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LGQK.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBC6.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Dividend Comparison
IBC6.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LGQK.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBC6.DE iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LGQK.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist | 2.64% | 2.88% | 5.33% | 3.78% | 4.41% | 3.15% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBC6.DE and LGQK.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGQK.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGQK.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBC6.DE.
IBC6.DE tracks MSCI Australia, while LGQK.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IBC6.DE and 0.12% for LGQK.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBC6.DE and LGQK.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer