IBC6.DE vs. FVSJ.DE
IBC6.DE (iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF) and FVSJ.DE (Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IBC6.DE tracks the MSCI Australia while FVSJ.DE tracks the FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBC6.DE returned 6.48%/yr vs 14.63%/yr for FVSJ.DE. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBC6.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FVSJ.DE.
Performance
IBC6.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBC6.DE achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly lower than FVSJ.DE's 45.45% return.
IBC6.DE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 12.44%
- 1Y
- 11.70%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
FVSJ.DE
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 45.45%
- 6M
- 48.21%
- 1Y
- 72.24%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 14.63%
- 10Y*
- —
IBC6.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBC6.DE iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 10.86% | 1.01% | 8.47% | 10.05% | -0.95% | 18.21% | -1.41% | 25.74% | -7.89% |
FVSJ.DE Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF | 45.45% | 15.41% | 14.01% | 8.23% | -7.58% | 13.71% | -3.67% | 13.83% | -5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBC6.DE and FVSJ.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018 | 0.60 |
The correlation between IBC6.DE and FVSJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBC6.DE vs. FVSJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBC6.DE
FVSJ.DE
IBC6.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FVSJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBC6.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.64 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 6.17 | -4.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 23.31 | -19.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBC6.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 3.60 | -2.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.94 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.65 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
IBC6.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBC6.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.64%, which is greater than FVSJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC6.DE and FVSJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBC6.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.64% | -26.95% | -16.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.49% | -11.93% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.12% | -21.76% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | -21.76% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -2.76% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -5.16% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 3.16% | -0.24% |
Volatility
IBC6.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) is 3.71%, while Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FVSJ.DE) has a volatility of 9.05%. This indicates that IBC6.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVSJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBC6.DE | FVSJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 9.05% | -5.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 17.69% | -7.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.47% | 20.43% | -6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 15.44% | +1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 17.16% | +2.15% |
IBC6.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBC6.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FVSJ.DE's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBC6.DE vs. FVSJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBC6.DE nor FVSJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBC6.DE and FVSJ.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FVSJ.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FVSJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBC6.DE.
IBC6.DE tracks MSCI Australia, while FVSJ.DE tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IBC6.DE and 0.14% for FVSJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBC6.DE and FVSJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer