IBC6.DE vs. EUNJ.DE
IBC6.DE (iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF) and EUNJ.DE (iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - IBC6.DE tracks the MSCI Australia while EUNJ.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBC6.DE returned 8.07%/yr vs 7.05%/yr for EUNJ.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBC6.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EUNJ.DE.
Performance
IBC6.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBC6.DE achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly higher than EUNJ.DE's 8.50% return. Over the past 10 years, IBC6.DE has outperformed EUNJ.DE with an annualized return of 8.07%, while EUNJ.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.05% annualized return.
IBC6.DE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 12.44%
- 1Y
- 11.70%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
EUNJ.DE
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 12.72%
- 3Y*
- 9.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.05%
IBC6.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBC6.DE iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 10.86% | 1.01% | 8.47% | 10.05% | -0.95% | 18.21% | -1.41% | 25.74% | -7.69% | 5.50% |
EUNJ.DE iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 8.50% | 6.56% | 11.50% | 1.85% | -1.18% | 12.54% | -3.43% | 21.23% | -6.37% | 10.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBC6.DE and EUNJ.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014 | 0.93 |
The correlation between IBC6.DE and EUNJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBC6.DE vs. EUNJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBC6.DE
EUNJ.DE
IBC6.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) and iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBC6.DE | EUNJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.20 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.14 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 6.18 | -2.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBC6.DE | EUNJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.14 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.36 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.42 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.35 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
IBC6.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBC6.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.64%, which is greater than EUNJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC6.DE and EUNJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBC6.DE | EUNJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.64% | -36.95% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.49% | -6.13% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.12% | -20.39% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | -20.39% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.64% | -36.95% | -6.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -2.02% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -6.94% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.13% | +0.79% |
Volatility
IBC6.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNJ.DE) at 3.04%. This indicates that IBC6.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBC6.DE | EUNJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 3.04% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 8.80% | +1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.47% | 11.57% | +1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 14.61% | +2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 16.54% | +2.77% |
IBC6.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBC6.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNJ.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBC6.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
IBC6.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EUNJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNJ.DE iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.46% | 2.95% | 3.35% | 3.56% | 3.92% | 2.79% | 2.64% | 3.52% | 3.78% | 3.41% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
IBC6.DE iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, IBC6.DE and EUNJ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IBC6.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBC6.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EUNJ.DE.
IBC6.DE tracks MSCI Australia, while EUNJ.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IBC6.DE and 0.60% for EUNJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBC6.DE and EUNJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer