IBC6.DE vs. DBX8.DE
IBC6.DE (iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF) and DBX8.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IBC6.DE tracks the MSCI Australia while DBX8.DE tracks the MSCI Korea 20/35 Custom. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBC6.DE returned 8.07%/yr vs 16.74%/yr for DBX8.DE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBC6.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBX8.DE.
Performance
IBC6.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBC6.DE achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly lower than DBX8.DE's 109.21% return. Over the past 10 years, IBC6.DE has underperformed DBX8.DE with an annualized return of 8.07%, while DBX8.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 16.74% annualized return.
IBC6.DE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 12.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
DBX8.DE
- 1D
- -5.08%
- 1M
- 16.35%
- YTD
- 109.21%
- 6M
- 127.53%
- 1Y
- 227.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.04%
- 5Y*
- 19.70%
- 10Y*
- 16.74%
IBC6.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBC6.DE iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 10.86% | 1.01% | 8.47% | 10.05% | -0.95% | 18.21% | -1.41% | 25.74% | -7.69% | 5.50% |
DBX8.DE Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C | 109.21% | 77.39% | -18.45% | 15.93% | -23.95% | -0.54% | 30.13% | 14.92% | -18.04% | 28.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBC6.DE and DBX8.DE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014 | 0.56 |
The correlation between IBC6.DE and DBX8.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBC6.DE vs. DBX8.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBC6.DE
DBX8.DE
IBC6.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBC6.DE | DBX8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.75 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 10.67 | -9.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 32.63 | -28.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBC6.DE | DBX8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 5.17 | -4.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.72 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.66 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.31 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
IBC6.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBC6.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.64%, smaller than the maximum DBX8.DE drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC6.DE and DBX8.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBC6.DE | DBX8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.64% | -68.01% | +24.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.49% | -21.19% | +13.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.12% | -30.70% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | -41.29% | +18.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.64% | -41.89% | -1.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -5.82% | +3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -17.55% | +9.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 6.94% | -4.02% |
Volatility
IBC6.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) is 3.71%, while Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE) has a volatility of 17.08%. This indicates that IBC6.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBX8.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBC6.DE | DBX8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 17.08% | -13.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 33.48% | -22.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.47% | 43.73% | -30.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 27.53% | -10.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 26.03% | -6.72% |
IBC6.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBC6.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DBX8.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBC6.DE vs. DBX8.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBC6.DE nor DBX8.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBC6.DE and DBX8.DE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBX8.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBX8.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBC6.DE.
IBC6.DE tracks MSCI Australia, while DBX8.DE tracks MSCI Korea 20/35 Custom. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IBC6.DE and 0.45% for DBX8.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBC6.DE and DBX8.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer