IBBQ vs. TRUH
IBBQ (Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF) and TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. IBBQ is passively managed, while TRUH is actively managed. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IBBQ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUH.
Performance
IBBQ vs. TRUH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBBQ
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 13.32%
- 1Y
- 44.71%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.42%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.57%
TRUH
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $517.67K | $836.57K | $727.46K | |
| $23.58K | $32.63K | $24.16K |
IBBQ vs. TRUH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 10.02% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBBQ and TRUH is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBBQ vs. TRUH — Risk / Return Rank
IBBQ
TRUH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBBQ vs. TRUH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBBQ | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.49 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.87 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBBQ vs. TRUH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBBQ drawdown since its inception was -37.94%, which is greater than TRUH's maximum drawdown of -4.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBBQ and TRUH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBBQ | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.94% | -4.51% | -33.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.14% | -2.75% | -3.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.38% | -1.64% | -14.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | — | — |
Volatility
IBBQ vs. TRUH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBBQ | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.18% | 17.62% | +2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.98% | 17.62% | +4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.85% | 17.62% | +4.23% |
IBBQ vs. TRUH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBBQ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUH's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBBQ vs. TRUH - Dividend Comparison
IBBQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than TRUH's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 0.80% | 0.90% | 1.14% | 0.81% | 0.76% | 0.63% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBBQ and TRUH have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IBBQ.
IBBQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.30% for TRUH.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IBBQ and 0.10% for TRUH.
Find the right allocation for IBBQ and TRUH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer