IBBQ vs. FRNW

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

IBBQ (Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF) and FRNW (Fidelity Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBBQ is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ / Biotechnology, while FRNW is a Alternative Energy Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. IBBQ is passively managed, while FRNW is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBBQ returned 13.02%/yr vs 6.49%/yr for FRNW. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBBQ charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FRNW.

Performance

IBBQ vs. FRNW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ) and Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBBQ achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly lower than FRNW's 23.62% return.

IBBQ

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 4.83%
• 6M: 4.79%
• 1Y: 40.36%
• 3Y*: 13.02%
• 5Y*: 4.49%
• 10Y*: —

FRNW

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -4.24%
• YTD: 23.62%
• 6M: 23.50%
• 1Y: 63.53%
• 3Y*: 6.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBBQ vs. FRNW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF	4.83%	33.32%	-0.63%	4.73%	-10.41%	-2.20%
FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF	23.62%	53.20%	-21.11%	-19.64%	-11.46%	-2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between IBBQ and FRNW is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021	0.51

The correlation between IBBQ and FRNW shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IBBQ vs. FRNW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IBBQ	FRNW
Healthcare	99.9%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	22.5%
Industrials	-	28.7%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	6.0%
Utilities	-	42.5%

Return for Risk

IBBQ vs. FRNW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBBQ

IBBQ Risk / Return Rank: 74
IBBQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
IBBQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
IBBQ Omega Ratio Rank: 61
IBBQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IBBQ Martin Ratio Rank: 84

FRNW

FRNW Risk / Return Rank: 79
FRNW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FRNW Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FRNW Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FRNW Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FRNW Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBBQ vs. FRNW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ) and Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBBQ	FRNW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	2.37	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	2.98	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.37	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.86	4.50	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.49	15.55	-0.06

IBBQ vs. FRNW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBBQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the FRNW Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBBQ and FRNW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IBBQ vs. FRNW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBBQ drawdown since its inception was -37.94%, smaller than the maximum FRNW drawdown of -59.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBBQ and FRNW.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBBQ	FRNW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.94%	-59.37%	+21.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.34%	-14.20%	+5.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.66%	-45.14%	+21.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-10.73%	+8.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.73%	-33.15%	+16.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.62%	4.10%	-1.48%

Volatility

IBBQ vs. FRNW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ) is 7.73%, while Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) has a volatility of 10.63%. This indicates that IBBQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRNW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBBQ	FRNW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.73%	10.63%	-2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.61%	19.59%	-3.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.08%	26.98%	-6.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.90%	28.51%	-6.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.89%	28.51%	-6.62%

IBBQ vs. FRNW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBBQ has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FRNW's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBBQ vs. FRNW - Dividend Comparison

IBBQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than FRNW's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF	1.02%	1.25%	1.43%	1.30%	0.69%	0.04%
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF	0.84%	0.90%	1.14%	0.81%	0.76%	0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBBQ and FRNW in my portfolio?

IBBQ and FRNW have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBBQ or FRNW?

FRNW has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to IBBQ (7.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBBQ dropped -37.94% vs FRNW's -59.37%.

Which ETF is better, IBBQ or FRNW?

On 3-year performance, IBBQ leads with 13.02% vs 6.49% for FRNW. On fees, IBBQ is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, IBBQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBBQ or FRNW?

Over the 3-year period, IBBQ has performed better with a 13.02% return vs 6.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBBQ or FRNW?

IBBQ is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FRNW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBBQ or FRNW?

FRNW has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.84% for IBBQ.

What is the main difference between IBBQ and FRNW?

IBBQ is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while FRNW is Alternative Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for IBBQ and 0.39% for FRNW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRNW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.