PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBAT vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBAT vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBAT achieves a 32.65% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.


IBAT

1D
0.04%
1M
-12.41%
6M
17.70%
YTD
32.65%
1Y
63.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.39%

SBIT

1D
5.60%
1M
-6.04%
6M
32.41%
YTD
39.44%
1Y
98.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-42.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.10M$1.47M$2.33M
$29.57M$32.71M$46.48M

IBAT vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
32.65%32.09%-11.66%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
39.44%-25.11%-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between IBAT and SBIT is -0.43, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

-0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBAT vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IBAT
IBAT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IBAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBAT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IBAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBAT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IBAT vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBATSBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.23

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.35

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.73

5.19

+3.54

IBAT vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBAT and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBAT vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBAT drawdown since its inception was -28.26%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBAT and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBATSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.26%

-91.35%

+63.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.85%

-47.94%

+22.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.73%

-77.87%

+57.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-69.07%

+61.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.15%

21.67%

-14.52%

Volatility

IBAT vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) is 12.10%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that IBAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBATSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.10%

18.09%

-5.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.99%

67.10%

-40.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.59%

88.65%

-57.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.08%

96.10%

-70.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.08%

96.10%

-70.02%

IBAT vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBAT vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

IBAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than SBIT's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
0.80%1.15%1.37%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
4.03%0.52%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBAT and SBIT have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to IBAT (12.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBAT dropped -28.26% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 63.73% for IBAT. On fees, IBAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IBAT has been the lower-risk option at 12.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 63.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 0.80% for IBAT.

IBAT is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. IBAT tracks STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBAT and 0.95% for SBIT.

IBAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBAT and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer