PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBAT vs. ENB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBAT vs. ENB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBAT achieves a 64.52% return, which is significantly higher than ENB's 19.75% return.


IBAT

1D
-1.22%
1M
10.03%
YTD
64.52%
6M
57.93%
1Y
124.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ENB

1D
-0.91%
1M
3.29%
YTD
19.75%
6M
19.95%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
14.50%
10Y*
9.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBAT vs. ENB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
64.52%32.09%-13.19%
ENB
Enbridge Inc.
19.75%19.51%24.64%

Correlation

The correlation between IBAT and ENB is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024

0.15

The correlation between IBAT and ENB shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBAT vs. ENB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBAT
IBAT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IBAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IBAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ENB
ENB Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ENB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENB Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ENB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENB Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBAT vs. ENB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBATENBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.27

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.21

2.78

+7.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.91

6.97

+19.94

IBAT vs. ENB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBAT Sharpe Ratio is 4.75, which is higher than the ENB Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBAT and ENB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBATENBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.75

1.57

+3.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

0.53

+0.89

Drawdowns

IBAT vs. ENB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBAT drawdown since its inception was -28.26%, smaller than the maximum ENB drawdown of -46.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBAT and ENB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBATENBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.26%

-46.35%

+18.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.25%

-9.10%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-3.84%

+2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.74%

-10.83%

+3.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.64%

3.69%

+0.95%

Volatility

IBAT vs. ENB - Volatility Comparison

iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) has a higher volatility of 10.25% compared to Enbridge Inc. (ENB) at 5.73%. This indicates that IBAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBATENBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.25%

5.73%

+4.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.28%

12.90%

+7.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.35%

16.06%

+10.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.83%

18.62%

+5.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.83%

24.34%

-0.51%

Dividends

IBAT vs. ENB - Dividend Comparison

IBAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than ENB's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENB
Enbridge Inc.
4.97%5.66%6.28%7.31%6.80%6.85%7.55%5.58%6.68%4.71%4.13%4.71%
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
0.70%1.15%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBAT and ENB have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBAT has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to ENB (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBAT dropped -28.26% vs ENB's -46.35%.

IBAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.75 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBAT and ENB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer