IB1T.DE vs. XWTS.DE
IB1T.DE (iShares Bitcoin ETP) and XWTS.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IB1T.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by iShares, while XWTS.DE is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. IB1T.DE is actively managed, while XWTS.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, IB1T.DE returned -45.39% vs 17.14% for XWTS.DE. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
IB1T.DE vs. XWTS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IB1T.DE achieves a -26.15% return, which is significantly lower than XWTS.DE's 3.05% return.
IB1T.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- -30.99%
- YTD
- -26.15%
- 1Y
- -45.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -29.82%
XWTS.DE
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 3.05%
- 1Y
- 17.14%
- 3Y*
- 23.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.46%
IB1T.DE vs. XWTS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IB1T.DE iShares Bitcoin ETP | -26.15% | -15.22% |
XWTS.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C | 3.05% | 20.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between IB1T.DE and XWTS.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IB1T.DE vs. XWTS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IB1T.DE
XWTS.DE
IB1T.DE vs. XWTS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin ETP (IB1T.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IB1T.DE | XWTS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.20 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 1.86 | -2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 5.40 | -6.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IB1T.DE vs. XWTS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IB1T.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, which is greater than XWTS.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IB1T.DE and XWTS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IB1T.DE | XWTS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.30% | -39.32% | -12.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.30% | -9.17% | -43.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.41% | -4.94% | -43.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.07% | -12.40% | -10.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.99% | 3.16% | +29.83% |
Volatility
IB1T.DE vs. XWTS.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Bitcoin ETP (IB1T.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.DE) at 7.49%. This indicates that IB1T.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XWTS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IB1T.DE | XWTS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.34% | 7.49% | +2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.15% | 11.95% | +18.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.86% | 15.54% | +25.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.22% | 18.44% | +21.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.22% | 18.04% | +22.18% |
IB1T.DE vs. XWTS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IB1T.DE and XWTS.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IB1T.DE vs. XWTS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IB1T.DE nor XWTS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IB1T.DE and XWTS.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IB1T.DE and XWTS.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
IB1T.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while XWTS.DE is Communications Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers.
Find the right allocation for IB1T.DE and XWTS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer