IB1T.DE vs. XDWH.DE
IB1T.DE (iShares Bitcoin ETP) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IB1T.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by iShares, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. IB1T.DE is actively managed, while XDWH.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, IB1T.DE returned -45.39% vs 20.61% for XDWH.DE. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
IB1T.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IB1T.DE achieves a -26.15% return, which is significantly lower than XDWH.DE's 4.45% return.
IB1T.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- -30.99%
- YTD
- -26.15%
- 1Y
- -45.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -29.82%
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 6.43%
- 6M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 4.45%
- 1Y
- 20.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.70%
IB1T.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IB1T.DE iShares Bitcoin ETP | -26.15% | -15.22% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 4.45% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IB1T.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IB1T.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IB1T.DE
XDWH.DE
IB1T.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin ETP (IB1T.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IB1T.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.25 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 2.09 | -2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 5.36 | -6.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IB1T.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IB1T.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, which is greater than XDWH.DE's maximum drawdown of -40.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IB1T.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IB1T.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.30% | -40.65% | -11.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.30% | -9.82% | -42.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.41% | -2.91% | -45.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.07% | -7.33% | -15.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.99% | 3.84% | +29.15% |
Volatility
IB1T.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Bitcoin ETP (IB1T.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 5.17%. This indicates that IB1T.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IB1T.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.34% | 5.17% | +5.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.15% | 10.44% | +19.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.86% | 14.28% | +26.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.22% | 13.57% | +26.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.22% | 15.65% | +24.57% |
IB1T.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IB1T.DE and XDWH.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IB1T.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IB1T.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IB1T.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IB1T.DE and XDWH.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
IB1T.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers.
Find the right allocation for IB1T.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer