PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAUS.L vs. ITWN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAUS.L vs. ITWN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IAUS.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (ITWN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IAUS.L is traded in USD, while ITWN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ITWN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAUS.L achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly lower than ITWN.L's 59.13% return. Over the past 10 years, IAUS.L has underperformed ITWN.L with an annualized return of 7.93%, while ITWN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.14% annualized return.


IAUS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.74%
6M
9.27%
YTD
10.07%
1Y
11.31%
3Y*
11.10%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
7.93%
ALL TIME*
5.87%

ITWN.L

1D
4.42%
1M
-7.24%
6M
49.94%
YTD
59.13%
1Y
81.60%
3Y*
41.23%
5Y*
20.34%
10Y*
20.14%
ALL TIME*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAUS.L vs. ITWN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAUS.L
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.07%13.86%1.70%13.84%-5.50%8.27%9.46%21.85%-12.47%20.13%
ITWN.L
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF
59.13%31.86%23.68%28.27%-29.51%28.66%34.37%35.09%-9.34%24.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IAUS.L and ITWN.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2010

0.58

The correlation between IAUS.L and ITWN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IAUS.L vs. ITWN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IAUS.L
ITWN.L

Financial Services

41.7%
11.9%

Basic Materials

24.5%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
1.1%

Real Estate

5.0%

-

Healthcare

4.9%
0.7%

Industrials

4.4%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
0.7%

Energy

3.8%

-

Communication Services

1.8%
1.3%

Utilities

1.6%

-

Technology

0.9%
80.4%

Financial Services

IAUS.L
41.7%
ITWN.L
11.9%

Basic Materials

IAUS.L
24.5%
ITWN.L
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IAUS.L
7.3%
ITWN.L
1.1%

Real Estate

IAUS.L
5.0%
ITWN.L

-

Healthcare

IAUS.L
4.9%
ITWN.L
0.7%

Industrials

IAUS.L
4.4%
ITWN.L
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

IAUS.L
4.0%
ITWN.L
0.7%

Energy

IAUS.L
3.8%
ITWN.L

-

Communication Services

IAUS.L
1.8%
ITWN.L
1.3%

Utilities

IAUS.L
1.6%
ITWN.L

-

Technology

IAUS.L
0.9%
ITWN.L
80.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAUS.L vs. ITWN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAUS.L
IAUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IAUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ITWN.L
ITWN.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ITWN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITWN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITWN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ITWN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITWN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAUS.L vs. ITWN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IAUS.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (ITWN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAUS.LITWN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.47

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

5.59

-4.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.84

17.93

-15.09

IAUS.L vs. ITWN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the ITWN.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAUS.L and ITWN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAUS.L vs. ITWN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAUS.L drawdown since its inception was -44.76%, smaller than the maximum ITWN.L drawdown of -79.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUS.L and ITWN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUS.LITWN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.76%

-79.46%

+34.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-14.53%

+4.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.04%

-28.01%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.60%

-41.23%

+16.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.76%

-41.23%

-3.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.38%

-10.18%

+5.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.26%

-33.88%

+24.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

4.54%

-0.56%

Volatility

IAUS.L vs. ITWN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IAUS.L) is 3.52%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (ITWN.L) has a volatility of 12.63%. This indicates that IAUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITWN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUS.LITWN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

12.63%

-9.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.34%

24.62%

-11.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.89%

28.02%

-12.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.49%

23.62%

-4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.74%

21.85%

-1.11%

IAUS.L vs. ITWN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAUS.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ITWN.L's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAUS.L vs. ITWN.L - Dividend Comparison

IAUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITWN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAUS.L
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITWN.L
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF
0.94%1.50%1.37%2.14%3.54%1.33%1.83%2.30%2.72%0.13%2.86%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAUS.L and ITWN.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IAUS.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IAUS.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for ITWN.L.

IAUS.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while ITWN.L is Taiwan Equities. IAUS.L tracks MSCI Australia Index (Net), while ITWN.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IAUS.L and 0.74% for ITWN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAUS.L and ITWN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer