IAUM vs. DGP
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP).
IAUM and DGP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IAUM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Jun 15, 2021. DGP is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%). It was launched on Feb 27, 2008. Both IAUM and DGP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IAUM vs. DGP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IAUM vs. DGP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | 8.63% | 64.27% | 27.04% | 13.12% | -0.49% | 3.87% |
DGP DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes | 13.65% | 141.40% | 53.16% | 16.97% | -5.54% | 6.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAUM achieves a 8.63% return, which is significantly lower than DGP's 13.65% return.
IAUM
- 1D
- 3.78%
- 1M
- -11.00%
- YTD
- 8.63%
- 6M
- 21.30%
- 1Y
- 49.82%
- 3Y*
- 33.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGP
- 1D
- 9.12%
- 1M
- -22.14%
- YTD
- 13.65%
- 6M
- 37.68%
- 1Y
- 101.12%
- 3Y*
- 63.02%
- 5Y*
- 38.30%
- 10Y*
- 22.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IAUM vs. DGP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAUM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DGP's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IAUM vs. DGP — Risk / Return Rank
IAUM
DGP
IAUM vs. DGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAUM | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.82 | 1.84 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 2.24 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 2.91 | -0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.05 | 11.14 | -1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAUM | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 1.84 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.30 | +0.98 |
Correlation
The correlation between IAUM and DGP is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IAUM vs. DGP - Dividend Comparison
Neither IAUM nor DGP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IAUM vs. DGP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAUM drawdown since its inception was -20.87%, smaller than the maximum DGP drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUM and DGP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAUM | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.87% | -75.31% | +54.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.15% | -36.58% | +17.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -51.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.18% | -24.38% | +11.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -41.24% | +36.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.18% | 9.54% | -4.36% |
Volatility
IAUM vs. DGP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) is 10.97%, while DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) has a volatility of 25.22%. This indicates that IAUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IAUM | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.97% | 25.22% | -14.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.96% | 48.02% | -24.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.51% | 55.31% | -27.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 38.32% | -20.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 34.93% | -17.15% |