PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAUM vs. CGAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAUM vs. CGAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAUM achieves a -4.79% return, which is significantly lower than CGAU's 13.53% return.


IAUM

1D
-0.34%
1M
-2.36%
6M
-8.92%
YTD
-4.79%
1Y
22.29%
3Y*
28.48%
5Y*
17.75%
10Y*

CGAU

1D
0.06%
1M
3.84%
6M
6.21%
YTD
13.53%
1Y
125.65%
3Y*
41.80%
5Y*
18.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAUM vs. CGAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IAUM
iShares Gold Trust Micro
-4.79%64.27%27.04%13.12%-0.49%3.87%
CGAU
Centerra Gold Inc
13.53%159.49%-1.45%19.37%-32.55%-2.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IAUM and CGAU is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021

0.63

The correlation between IAUM and CGAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAUM vs. CGAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAUM
IAUM Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IAUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUM Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUM Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

CGAU
CGAU Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CGAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGAU Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CGAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGAU Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAUM vs. CGAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAUMCGAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.36

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

4.42

-3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.24

11.31

-9.07

IAUM vs. CGAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAUM Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the CGAU Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAUM and CGAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAUM vs. CGAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAUM drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum CGAU drawdown of -63.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUM and CGAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUMCGAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.14%

-63.47%

+37.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.14%

-29.50%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.14%

-30.24%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

-63.47%

+37.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.91%

-22.42%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-29.49%

+23.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.52%

11.52%

-1.00%

Volatility

IAUM vs. CGAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) is 8.24%, while Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU) has a volatility of 15.89%. This indicates that IAUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUMCGAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.24%

15.89%

-7.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.77%

43.07%

-19.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.48%

52.55%

-25.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

47.18%

-28.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.14%

48.83%

-30.69%

Dividends

IAUM vs. CGAU - Dividend Comparison

IAUM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.


PositionTTM202520242023
CGAU
Centerra Gold Inc
1.25%1.39%3.59%3.45%
IAUM
iShares Gold Trust Micro
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAUM and CGAU have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGAU has higher volatility (15.89%) compared to IAUM (8.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAUM dropped -26.14% vs CGAU's -63.47%.

CGAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAUM and CGAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer