PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAUI vs. HYBI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAUI vs. HYBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAUI achieves a -5.63% return, which is significantly lower than HYBI's 1.71% return.


IAUI

1D
-2.15%
1M
-8.06%
YTD
-5.63%
6M
-8.22%
1Y
12.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYBI

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.71%
6M
1.90%
1Y
6.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAUI vs. HYBI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
-5.63%20.00%
HYBI
NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF
1.71%5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IAUI and HYBI is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAUI vs. HYBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAUI
IAUI Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
IAUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUI Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUI Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

HYBI
HYBI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
HYBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYBI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
HYBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAUI vs. HYBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAUIHYBIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.38

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

4.60

-3.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.87

14.75

-12.88

IAUI vs. HYBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAUI Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the HYBI Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAUI and HYBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAUI vs. HYBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAUI drawdown since its inception was -20.43%, which is greater than HYBI's maximum drawdown of -4.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUI and HYBI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUIHYBIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.43%

-4.68%

-15.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.43%

-1.43%

-19.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.97%

-0.26%

-19.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-0.61%

-3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.86%

0.44%

+6.42%

Volatility

IAUI vs. HYBI - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) at 1.28%. This indicates that IAUI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUIHYBIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.78%

1.28%

+6.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.82%

2.35%

+17.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.42%

3.37%

+18.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.06%

4.94%

+16.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.06%

4.94%

+16.12%

IAUI vs. HYBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAUI has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than HYBI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAUI vs. HYBI - Dividend Comparison

IAUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.80%, more than HYBI's 9.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
HYBI
NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF
9.09%8.48%2.21%
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
14.80%6.88%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAUI and HYBI have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAUI has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to HYBI (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAUI dropped -20.43% vs HYBI's -4.68%.

On 1-year performance, IAUI leads with 12.83% vs 6.54% for HYBI. On fees, HYBI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HYBI has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IAUI has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 6.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYBI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.

IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 14.80%, compared with 9.09% for HYBI.

IAUI is categorized as Derivative Income, while HYBI is Nontraditional Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for IAUI and 0.68% for HYBI.

HYBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAUI and HYBI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer