IAUI vs. FTQI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) and FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAUI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos, while FTQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. IAUI is actively managed, while FTQI is passively managed. Over the past year, IAUI returned 10.20% vs 26.34% for FTQI. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IAUI charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FTQI.

Performance

IAUI vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAUI achieves a -8.32% return, which is significantly lower than FTQI's 12.76% return.

IAUI

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: -7.87%
• 6M: -13.00%
• YTD: -8.32%
• 1Y: 10.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTQI

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 1.28%
• 6M: 11.68%
• YTD: 12.76%
• 1Y: 26.34%
• 3Y*: 16.62%
• 5Y*: 12.26%
• 10Y*: 7.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAUI vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF	-8.32%	20.00%
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF	12.76%	15.35%

Correlation

The correlation between IAUI and FTQI is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.25

Return for Risk

IAUI vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAUI

IAUI Risk / Return Rank: 17
IAUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
IAUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
IAUI Omega Ratio Rank: 19
IAUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
IAUI Martin Ratio Rank: 16

FTQI

FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 91
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAUI vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IAUI	FTQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	2.43	-1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	3.37	-2.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.45	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.46	4.24	-3.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.18	20.07	-18.89

IAUI vs. FTQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAUI Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the FTQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAUI and FTQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IAUI vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAUI drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, which is greater than FTQI's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUI and FTQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IAUI	FTQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.50%	-19.42%	-3.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.50%	-6.24%	-16.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.25%	-0.85%	-21.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.09%	-3.73%	-1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.67%	1.32%	+7.35%

Volatility

IAUI vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) at 2.92%. This indicates that IAUI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IAUI	FTQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.31%	2.92%	+3.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.01%	8.83%	+11.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.90%	10.87%	+11.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.09%	14.82%	+6.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.09%	12.98%	+8.11%

IAUI vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAUI has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IAUI vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison

IAUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.15%, more than FTQI's 10.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF	10.92%	11.46%	11.66%	11.49%	9.85%	3.05%	3.27%	2.95%	3.27%	2.74%	3.02%	3.54%
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF	14.15%	6.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IAUI and FTQI in my portfolio?

IAUI and FTQI have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IAUI or FTQI?

IAUI has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to FTQI (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAUI dropped -22.50% vs FTQI's -19.42%.

Which ETF is better, IAUI or FTQI?

On 1-year performance, FTQI leads with 26.34% vs 10.20% for IAUI. On fees, FTQI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FTQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IAUI or FTQI?

Over the 1-year period, FTQI has performed better with a 26.34% return vs 10.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IAUI or FTQI?

FTQI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IAUI or FTQI?

IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 14.15%, compared with 10.92% for FTQI.

What is the main difference between IAUI and FTQI?

IAUI is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Neos and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for IAUI and 0.75% for FTQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.