IAUI vs. BUYW
IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) and BUYW (Main Buywrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IAUI returned 10.68% vs 8.45% for BUYW. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IAUI charges 0.78%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for BUYW.
Performance
IAUI vs. BUYW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAUI achieves a -8.62% return, which is significantly lower than BUYW's 3.10% return.
IAUI
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- -10.97%
- YTD
- -8.62%
- 6M
- -10.82%
- 1Y
- 10.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUYW
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 3.10%
- 6M
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- 8.45%
- 3Y*
- 8.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAUI vs. BUYW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | -8.62% | 20.00% |
BUYW Main Buywrite ETF | 3.10% | 6.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAUI and BUYW is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAUI vs. BUYW — Risk / Return Rank
IAUI
BUYW
IAUI vs. BUYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAUI | BUYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.34 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 3.28 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.53 | 17.45 | -15.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAUI vs. BUYW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAUI drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, which is greater than BUYW's maximum drawdown of -9.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUI and BUYW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAUI | BUYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.50% | -9.36% | -13.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.50% | -2.59% | -19.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.50% | -0.62% | -21.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -0.60% | -3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.01% | 0.48% | +6.53% |
Volatility
IAUI vs. BUYW - Volatility Comparison
NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) has a higher volatility of 8.26% compared to Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) at 1.36%. This indicates that IAUI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUYW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAUI | BUYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.26% | 1.36% | +6.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.07% | 3.89% | +16.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.66% | 4.88% | +16.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 8.43% | +12.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 8.43% | +12.82% |
IAUI vs. BUYW - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAUI has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than BUYW's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAUI vs. BUYW - Dividend Comparison
IAUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.28%, more than BUYW's 5.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYW Main Buywrite ETF | 5.44% | 5.89% | 5.93% | 5.95% | 0.50% |
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | 15.28% | 6.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAUI and BUYW have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAUI has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to BUYW (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAUI dropped -22.50% vs BUYW's -9.36%.
On 1-year performance, IAUI leads with 10.68% vs 8.45% for BUYW. On fees, IAUI is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, BUYW has been the lower-risk option at 1.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IAUI has performed better with a 10.68% return vs 8.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAUI is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BUYW.
IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 15.28%, compared with 5.44% for BUYW.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and Main Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for IAUI and 1.29% for BUYW.
BUYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAUI and BUYW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer