IAUI vs. AAAU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU).

IAUI and AAAU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IAUI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Jun 4, 2025. AAAU is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jul 26, 2018.

Performance

IAUI vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IAUI vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF	4.93%	20.56%
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	8.55%	28.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAUI achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 8.55% return.

IAUI

• 1D: 3.78%
• 1M: -10.02%
• YTD: 4.93%
• 6M: 15.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAAU

• 1D: 3.76%
• 1M: -11.04%
• YTD: 8.55%
• 6M: 21.17%
• 1Y: 49.58%
• 3Y*: 33.19%
• 5Y*: 21.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAUI vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAUI has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.

IAUI

NEOS Gold High Income ETF

AAAU

Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF

Return for Risk

IAUI vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAU

AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 87
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAUI vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IAUI	AAAU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.62	1.17	+0.45

Correlation

The correlation between IAUI and AAAU is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

IAUI vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

IAUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.00%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF	10.00%	6.88%
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

IAUI vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAUI drawdown since its inception was -16.88%, smaller than the maximum AAAU drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUI and AAAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	IAUI	AAAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.88%	-21.63%	+4.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.01%	-13.19%	+2.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-6.00%	+4.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IAUI	AAAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.01%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.78%	27.49%	-6.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.78%	17.58%	+3.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.78%	16.92%	+3.86%