PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAU vs. UBUS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAU vs. UBUS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IAU is traded in USD, while UBUS.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the UBUS.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAU achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than UBUS.DE's 7.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IAU having a 12.49% annualized return and UBUS.DE not far behind at 12.01%.


IAU

1D
2.61%
1M
-4.97%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.22%
1Y
25.52%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
18.47%
10Y*
12.49%

UBUS.DE

1D
1.11%
1M
3.92%
YTD
7.92%
6M
8.09%
1Y
20.46%
3Y*
12.64%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
12.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAU vs. UBUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.11%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%
UBUS.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
7.92%13.34%7.45%15.93%-8.25%30.38%5.59%30.75%-8.76%20.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IAU and UBUS.DE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2015

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAU vs. UBUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

UBUS.DE
UBUS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
UBUS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBUS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBUS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
UBUS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBUS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAU vs. UBUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAUUBUS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.29

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

2.49

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.00

8.73

-5.73

IAU vs. UBUS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAU Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the UBUS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAU and UBUS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAU vs. UBUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, which is greater than UBUS.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and UBUS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUUBUS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-31.43%

-13.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.40%

-8.17%

-16.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

-18.75%

-5.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.40%

-19.31%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.40%

-31.43%

+7.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.00%

0.00%

-20.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-4.58%

-11.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.56%

2.34%

+6.22%

Volatility

IAU vs. UBUS.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUS.DE) at 2.64%. This indicates that IAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBUS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUUBUS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

2.64%

+5.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.06%

8.36%

+15.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.29%

12.02%

+15.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.20%

15.44%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.04%

16.33%

-0.29%

IAU vs. UBUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IAU and UBUS.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IAU vs. UBUS.DE - Dividend Comparison

IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UBUS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UBUS.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.13%1.24%0.67%1.52%1.62%1.56%1.89%1.30%1.93%1.60%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAU and UBUS.DE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IAU and UBUS.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

IAU is categorized as Gold, while UBUS.DE is Large Cap Value Equities. IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price, while UBUS.DE tracks MSCI USA Prime Value. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAU and UBUS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer