IAU vs. OUNZ
IAU (iShares Gold Trust) and OUNZ (VanEck Merk Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while OUNZ is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IAU returned 13.31%/yr vs 13.22%/yr for OUNZ. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
IAU vs. OUNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IAU having a 2.98% return and OUNZ slightly higher at 3.01%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IAU having a 13.31% annualized return and OUNZ not far behind at 13.22%.
IAU
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 2.98%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- 1Y
- 32.20%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- 18.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
OUNZ
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- 3.01%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 32.21%
- 3Y*
- 31.27%
- 5Y*
- 18.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.22%
IAU vs. OUNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 2.98% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | -4.00% | 25.03% | 17.98% | -1.76% | 12.91% |
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold Trust | 3.01% | 63.95% | 26.75% | 12.83% | -0.51% | -4.00% | 24.71% | 18.00% | -2.06% | 12.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAU and OUNZ is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2014 | 0.99 |
The correlation between IAU and OUNZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
IAU vs. OUNZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IAU
OUNZ
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
IAU
OUNZ
Basic Materials
IAU
-
OUNZ
-
Communication Services
IAU
-
OUNZ
-
Consumer Cyclical
IAU
-
OUNZ
-
Consumer Defensive
IAU
-
OUNZ
-
Energy
IAU
-
OUNZ
-
Financial Services
IAU
-
OUNZ
-
Healthcare
IAU
-
OUNZ
-
Industrials
IAU
-
OUNZ
-
Technology
IAU
-
OUNZ
-
Utilities
IAU
-
OUNZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAU vs. OUNZ — Risk / Return Rank
IAU
OUNZ
IAU vs. OUNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAU | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.62 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 1.69 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | 4.20 | -0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAU | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 1.03 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.83 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.66 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
IAU vs. OUNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, which is greater than OUNZ's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and OUNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAU | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.14% | -21.77% | -23.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.18% | -19.14% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.18% | -19.14% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.93% | -21.01% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.82% | -21.76% | -0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.70% | -17.65% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -7.57% | -8.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.71% | 7.69% | +0.02% |
Volatility
IAU vs. OUNZ - Volatility Comparison
iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) have volatilities of 5.50% and 5.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAU | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 5.52% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.02% | 22.98% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.42% | 26.40% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 17.91% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 15.96% | -0.06% |
IAU vs. OUNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IAU and OUNZ have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IAU vs. OUNZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither IAU nor OUNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, IAU and OUNZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
OUNZ has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to IAU (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAU dropped -45.14% vs OUNZ's -21.77%.
On 10-year performance, IAU leads with 13.31% vs 13.22% for OUNZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IAU has performed better with a 13.31% return vs 13.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAU and OUNZ have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
IAU and OUNZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
IAU is categorized as Gold, while OUNZ is Precious Metals. IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price, while OUNZ tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Merk.
OUNZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAU and OUNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer