PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAU vs. MIVU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAU vs. MIVU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IAU is traded in USD, while MIVU.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MIVU.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAU achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than MIVU.DE's 1.94% return.


IAU

1D
2.61%
1M
-4.97%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.22%
1Y
25.52%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
18.47%
10Y*
12.49%

MIVU.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
1.64%
YTD
1.94%
6M
2.88%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
10.50%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAU vs. MIVU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.11%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%7.71%
MIVU.DE
Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF
1.94%8.52%15.86%8.69%-9.56%21.48%3.89%27.26%-6.95%

Correlation

The correlation between IAU and MIVU.DE is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2018

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAU vs. MIVU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MIVU.DE
MIVU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MIVU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAU vs. MIVU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAUMIVU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.10

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

0.87

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.00

2.62

+0.38

IAU vs. MIVU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAU Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the MIVU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAU and MIVU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAU vs. MIVU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, which is greater than MIVU.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and MIVU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUMIVU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-33.16%

-11.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.40%

-5.50%

-18.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

-11.17%

-13.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.40%

-17.58%

-6.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.00%

-0.61%

-19.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-4.27%

-11.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.56%

1.83%

+6.73%

Volatility

IAU vs. MIVU.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE) at 2.27%. This indicates that IAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIVU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUMIVU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

2.27%

+6.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.06%

5.69%

+18.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.29%

8.33%

+18.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.20%

12.06%

+6.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.04%

14.21%

+1.83%

IAU vs. MIVU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MIVU.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IAU vs. MIVU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAU nor MIVU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IAU and MIVU.DE have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MIVU.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MIVU.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IAU.

IAU is categorized as Gold, while MIVU.DE is Large Cap Blend Equities. IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price, while MIVU.DE tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IAU and 0.18% for MIVU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAU and MIVU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer