PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAU vs. KO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAU vs. KO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAU achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than KO's 18.99% return. Over the past 10 years, IAU has outperformed KO with an annualized return of 12.31%, while KO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.55% annualized return.


IAU

1D
0.08%
1M
-9.54%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-2.22%
1Y
22.32%
3Y*
29.07%
5Y*
17.23%
10Y*
12.31%

KO

1D
0.11%
1M
2.70%
YTD
18.99%
6M
17.96%
1Y
18.86%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
9.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAU vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
-2.44%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
18.99%15.60%8.88%-4.43%10.61%11.37%2.47%20.60%6.77%14.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IAU and KO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2005

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAU vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

KO
KO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
KO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
KO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
KO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAU vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAUKODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.19

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

2.26

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.83

4.51

-1.68

IAU vs. KO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAU Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the KO Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAU and KO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAU vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, smaller than the maximum KO drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and KO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUKODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-68.23%

+23.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.40%

-7.87%

-16.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

-16.26%

-8.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.40%

-17.27%

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.40%

-36.99%

+12.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.03%

-1.16%

-20.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-16.09%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.47%

3.98%

+4.49%

Volatility

IAU vs. KO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 6.70%. This indicates that IAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUKODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

6.70%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.94%

12.87%

+11.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.17%

16.73%

+10.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.16%

16.18%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

18.24%

-2.22%

Dividends

IAU vs. KO - Dividend Comparison

IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
1.88%2.92%3.12%3.12%2.77%2.84%2.99%2.89%3.29%3.23%3.38%3.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAU and KO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAU has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to KO (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAU dropped -45.14% vs KO's -68.23%.

KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAU and KO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer