PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAU vs. IUSQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAU vs. IUSQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IAU is traded in USD, while IUSQ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IUSQ.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAU achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than IUSQ.DE's 10.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IAU having a 12.31% annualized return and IUSQ.DE not far ahead at 12.91%.


IAU

1D
0.08%
1M
-9.54%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-2.22%
1Y
22.32%
3Y*
29.07%
5Y*
17.23%
10Y*
12.31%

IUSQ.DE

1D
1.75%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
10.01%
6M
11.76%
1Y
26.66%
3Y*
19.85%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
12.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAU vs. IUSQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
-2.44%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%
IUSQ.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)
10.01%23.07%17.40%22.32%-18.34%18.95%15.19%27.40%-10.39%24.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IAU and IUSQ.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.13

The correlation between IAU and IUSQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAU vs. IUSQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSQ.DE
IUSQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAU vs. IUSQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAUIUSQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.36

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

2.89

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.83

12.04

-9.21

IAU vs. IUSQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAU Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAU and IUSQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAU vs. IUSQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, which is greater than IUSQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and IUSQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUIUSQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-34.07%

-11.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.40%

-8.85%

-15.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

-17.48%

-6.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.40%

-26.08%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.40%

-34.07%

+9.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.03%

-1.91%

-20.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-5.02%

-10.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.47%

2.13%

+6.34%

Volatility

IAU vs. IUSQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) at 3.93%. This indicates that IAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUIUSQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

3.93%

+3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.94%

9.72%

+14.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.17%

12.49%

+14.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.16%

15.50%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

15.92%

+0.10%

IAU vs. IUSQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IAU vs. IUSQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAU nor IUSQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IAU and IUSQ.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUSQ.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUSQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IAU.

IAU is categorized as Gold, while IUSQ.DE is Global Equities. IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price, while IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI). Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IAU and 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAU and IUSQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer