PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAU vs. IGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAU vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAU achieves a -5.52% return, which is significantly higher than IGLD's -6.36% return.


IAU

1D
0.66%
1M
-1.06%
6M
-17.56%
YTD
-5.52%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
27.77%
5Y*
17.43%
10Y*
11.52%
ALL TIME*
10.74%

IGLD

1D
0.54%
1M
-0.93%
6M
-16.31%
YTD
-6.36%
1Y
13.37%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$375.17M$380.53M$472.45M
$5.61M$5.68M$7.08M

IAU vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
-5.52%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%5.42%
IGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
-6.36%47.46%19.36%9.24%-2.34%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between IAU and IGLD is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021

0.93

The correlation between IAU and IGLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAU vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLD
IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IAU vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAUIGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.12

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

0.56

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.66

1.25

+0.42

IAU vs. IGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAU Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the IGLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAU and IGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAU vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, which is greater than IGLD's maximum drawdown of -23.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and IGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUIGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-23.84%

-21.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.36%

-23.84%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.36%

-23.84%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.36%

-23.84%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.50%

-21.87%

-2.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.02%

-5.72%

-10.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.36%

10.74%

+1.62%

Volatility

IAU vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) at 5.28%. This indicates that IAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUIGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.93%

5.28%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.43%

20.33%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.85%

25.07%

+2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.43%

15.75%

+2.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.07%

15.42%

+0.65%

IAU vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAU vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison

IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
23.16%9.91%20.81%7.85%4.45%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IAU and IGLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IAU has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to IGLD (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAU dropped -45.14% vs IGLD's -23.84%.

On 5-year performance, IAU leads with 17.43% vs 12.25% for IGLD. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IGLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IAU has performed better with a 17.43% return vs 12.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IGLD.

IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 23.16%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IAU and 0.85% for IGLD.

IAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAU and IGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer