PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAU vs. ELVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAU vs. ELVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Electrovaya Inc. Common Shares (ELVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAU achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than ELVA's 20.25% return. Over the past 10 years, IAU has outperformed ELVA with an annualized return of 12.31%, while ELVA has yielded a comparatively lower 2.89% annualized return.


IAU

1D
0.08%
1M
-7.39%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-2.22%
1Y
22.32%
3Y*
29.07%
5Y*
17.23%
10Y*
12.31%

ELVA

1D
-3.16%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
20.25%
6M
43.50%
1Y
181.07%
3Y*
37.56%
5Y*
9.63%
10Y*
2.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAU vs. ELVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
-2.44%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%
ELVA
Electrovaya Inc. Common Shares
20.25%218.55%-18.95%-17.30%2.78%-38.98%686.67%48.08%-80.52%-67.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IAU and ELVA is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2016

0.07

The correlation between IAU and ELVA shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAU vs. ELVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

ELVA
ELVA Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ELVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELVA Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ELVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELVA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAU vs. ELVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and Electrovaya Inc. Common Shares (ELVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAUELVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.32

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

3.80

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.83

9.01

-6.18

IAU vs. ELVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAU Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the ELVA Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAU and ELVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAU vs. ELVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, smaller than the maximum ELVA drawdown of -96.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and ELVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUELVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-96.90%

+51.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.40%

-44.42%

+20.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

-64.19%

+39.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.40%

-66.78%

+42.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.40%

-96.90%

+72.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.03%

-41.01%

+18.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-73.62%

+57.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.47%

18.71%

-10.24%

Volatility

IAU vs. ELVA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) is 7.70%, while Electrovaya Inc. Common Shares (ELVA) has a volatility of 27.27%. This indicates that IAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUELVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

27.27%

-19.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.94%

63.77%

-39.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.17%

84.18%

-57.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.16%

69.12%

-50.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

86.10%

-70.08%

Dividends

IAU vs. ELVA - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAU nor ELVA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IAU and ELVA have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ELVA has higher volatility (27.27%) compared to IAU (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAU dropped -45.14% vs ELVA's -96.90%.

ELVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAU and ELVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer