PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAU vs. CS.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAU vs. CS.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and AXA SA (CS.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IAU is traded in USD, while CS.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CS.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAU achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than CS.PA's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, IAU has underperformed CS.PA with an annualized return of 12.31%, while CS.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.28% annualized return.


IAU

1D
0.08%
1M
-9.54%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-2.22%
1Y
22.32%
3Y*
29.07%
5Y*
17.23%
10Y*
12.31%

CS.PA

1D
0.86%
1M
2.58%
YTD
4.12%
6M
5.67%
1Y
4.20%
3Y*
25.31%
5Y*
18.53%
10Y*
14.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAU vs. CS.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
-2.44%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%
CS.PA
AXA SA
4.12%42.62%15.89%24.04%-0.21%32.91%-12.08%38.36%-23.27%23.25%

Correlation

The correlation between IAU and CS.PA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007

0.08

The correlation between IAU and CS.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.19 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAU vs. CS.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

CS.PA
CS.PA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CS.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CS.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CS.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CS.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CS.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAU vs. CS.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and AXA SA (CS.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAUCS.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.05

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

0.22

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.83

0.40

+2.44

IAU vs. CS.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAU Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the CS.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAU and CS.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAU vs. CS.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, smaller than the maximum CS.PA drawdown of -79.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and CS.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUCS.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-79.24%

+34.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.40%

-14.59%

-9.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

-16.15%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.40%

-32.50%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.40%

-55.59%

+31.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.03%

-1.39%

-20.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-19.05%

+3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.47%

8.21%

+0.26%

Volatility

IAU vs. CS.PA - Volatility Comparison

iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to AXA SA (CS.PA) at 4.98%. This indicates that IAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CS.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUCS.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

4.98%

+2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.94%

15.18%

+8.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.17%

21.03%

+6.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.16%

23.84%

-5.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

26.67%

-10.65%

Dividends

IAU vs. CS.PA - Dividend Comparison

IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CS.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CS.PA
AXA SA
5.68%5.25%5.77%5.76%5.91%5.46%3.74%5.34%6.68%4.69%4.59%3.77%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAU and CS.PA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAU and CS.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer