PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAU vs. BBRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAU vs. BBRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAU achieves a -6.09% return, which is significantly lower than BBRE's 23.40% return.


IAU

1D
0.11%
1M
0.69%
6M
-18.72%
YTD
-6.09%
1Y
21.17%
3Y*
26.99%
5Y*
17.33%
10Y*
11.59%
ALL TIME*
10.72%

BBRE

1D
2.14%
1M
4.84%
6M
20.78%
YTD
23.40%
1Y
24.14%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.35M$4.29M$4.76M
$367.78M$389.80M$488.83M

IAU vs. BBRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
-6.09%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%0.00%
BBRE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF
23.40%2.09%8.24%13.85%-24.68%42.99%-7.55%26.06%-2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between IAU and BBRE is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2018

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAU vs. BBRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BBRE
BBRE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BBRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBRE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BBRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBRE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAU vs. BBRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAUBBREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.29

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

2.99

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.72

9.58

-7.86

IAU vs. BBRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAU Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the BBRE Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAU and BBRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAU vs. BBRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAU drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, roughly equal to the maximum BBRE drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAU and BBRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUBBREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-43.61%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.36%

-8.07%

-18.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.36%

-18.92%

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.36%

-31.15%

+4.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.95%

0.00%

-24.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.01%

-10.35%

-5.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.65%

2.51%

+9.14%

Volatility

IAU vs. BBRE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE) at 4.86%. This indicates that IAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUBBREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

4.86%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.78%

10.88%

+12.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.88%

14.29%

+13.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

18.81%

-0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

22.49%

-6.43%

IAU vs. BBRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BBRE's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IAU vs. BBRE - Dividend Comparison

IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBRE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF
2.51%3.24%3.19%3.68%2.62%1.70%3.17%2.19%1.96%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAU and BBRE have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAU has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to BBRE (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAU dropped -45.14% vs BBRE's -43.61%.

On 5-year performance, IAU leads with 17.33% vs 5.60% for BBRE. On fees, BBRE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, BBRE has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IAU has performed better with a 17.33% return vs 5.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBRE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IAU.

BBRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

IAU is categorized as Gold, while BBRE is REIT. IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price, while BBRE tracks MSCI US REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IAU and 0.11% for BBRE.

BBRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAU and BBRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer