PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IASP.L vs. MHEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IASP.L vs. MHEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) and MH Elite Income Fund of Funds (MHEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IASP.L is traded in GBp, while MHEIX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MHEIX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IASP.L achieves a -6.42% return, which is significantly lower than MHEIX's 3.30% return. Over the past 10 years, IASP.L has underperformed MHEIX with an annualized return of 2.46%, while MHEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.07% annualized return.


IASP.L

1D
0.41%
1M
-5.73%
YTD
-6.42%
6M
-5.31%
1Y
5.45%
3Y*
1.02%
5Y*
-1.54%
10Y*
2.46%

MHEIX

1D
0.81%
1M
2.38%
YTD
3.30%
6M
2.52%
1Y
10.29%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
3.39%
10Y*
4.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IASP.L vs. MHEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IASP.L
iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF
-6.42%21.55%-8.28%-7.53%-1.49%5.66%-11.71%12.30%3.64%7.73%
MHEIX
MH Elite Income Fund of Funds
3.30%-2.70%7.83%2.18%0.89%3.41%2.18%6.87%2.50%-3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between IASP.L and MHEIX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2013

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between IASP.L and MHEIX has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IASP.L vs. MHEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IASP.L
IASP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IASP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IASP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
IASP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
IASP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
IASP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

MHEIX
MHEIX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MHEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MHEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IASP.L vs. MHEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) and MH Elite Income Fund of Funds (MHEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IASP.LMHEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.24

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

1.80

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.17

4.49

-3.33

IASP.L vs. MHEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IASP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the MHEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IASP.L and MHEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IASP.LMHEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

1.15

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.38

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.42

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.48

-0.46

Drawdowns

IASP.L vs. MHEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IASP.L drawdown since its inception was -74.24%, which is greater than MHEIX's maximum drawdown of -13.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IASP.L and MHEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IASP.LMHEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.24%

-13.61%

-60.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.92%

-5.85%

-8.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.92%

-12.21%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.02%

-13.61%

-8.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.82%

-13.61%

-22.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.33%

-1.93%

-16.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.68%

-4.72%

-20.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.66%

2.34%

+2.32%

Volatility

IASP.L vs. MHEIX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to MH Elite Income Fund of Funds (MHEIX) at 2.56%. This indicates that IASP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MHEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IASP.LMHEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

2.56%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

7.90%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.20%

9.20%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.68%

9.07%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.42%

9.71%

+4.71%

IASP.L vs. MHEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IASP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than MHEIX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IASP.L vs. MHEIX - Dividend Comparison

IASP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than MHEIX's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IASP.L
iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF
3.77%3.45%4.16%3.84%3.63%3.00%3.42%3.07%3.30%3.13%2.82%3.43%
MHEIX
MH Elite Income Fund of Funds
3.71%0.00%3.33%2.38%3.17%1.49%2.30%2.21%2.10%1.69%2.48%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


IASP.L and MHEIX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IASP.L and MHEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer