IASP.L vs. IPRP.L
IASP.L (iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF) and IPRP.L (iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds from iShares - IASP.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Asia TR USD while IPRP.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IASP.L returned -0.92%/yr vs 1.98%/yr for IPRP.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IASP.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IPRP.L.
Performance
IASP.L vs. IPRP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IASP.L achieves a -7.66% return, which is significantly lower than IPRP.L's -0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, IASP.L has underperformed IPRP.L with an annualized return of -0.92%, while IPRP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 1.98% annualized return.
IASP.L
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -6.82%
- YTD
- -7.66%
- 6M
- -7.06%
- 1Y
- 3.44%
- 3Y*
- -2.88%
- 5Y*
- -4.60%
- 10Y*
- -0.92%
IPRP.L
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 1.71%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- -3.55%
- 10Y*
- 1.98%
IASP.L vs. IPRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IASP.L iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF | -7.66% | 17.20% | -11.78% | -10.90% | -4.90% | 2.59% | -14.59% | 8.99% | 0.23% | 4.41% |
IPRP.L iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF | -0.45% | 14.18% | -4.49% | 16.04% | -33.34% | 2.23% | -3.56% | 18.93% | -4.97% | 19.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between IASP.L and IPRP.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2006 | 0.46 |
IASP.L vs. IPRP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IASP.L
IPRP.L
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
IASP.L
IPRP.L
Basic Materials
IASP.L
-
IPRP.L
-
Communication Services
IASP.L
-
IPRP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IASP.L
-
IPRP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IASP.L
-
IPRP.L
-
Energy
IASP.L
-
IPRP.L
-
Financial Services
IASP.L
-
IPRP.L
-
Healthcare
IASP.L
-
IPRP.L
-
Industrials
IASP.L
-
IPRP.L
-
Technology
IASP.L
-
IPRP.L
-
Utilities
IASP.L
-
IPRP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IASP.L vs. IPRP.L — Risk / Return Rank
IASP.L
IPRP.L
IASP.L vs. IPRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) and iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IASP.L | IPRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.03 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 0.11 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.73 | 0.29 | +0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IASP.L | IPRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 0.11 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | -0.16 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | 0.10 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.22 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
IASP.L vs. IPRP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IASP.L drawdown since its inception was -57.81%, roughly equal to the maximum IPRP.L drawdown of -59.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IASP.L and IPRP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IASP.L | IPRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.81% | -59.70% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.22% | -16.11% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.10% | -16.11% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.75% | -48.44% | +17.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.88% | -48.44% | +6.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.67% | -22.85% | -12.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.17% | -14.69% | -4.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 5.93% | -1.24% |
Volatility
IASP.L vs. IPRP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) is 3.79%, while iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that IASP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IASP.L | IPRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 4.48% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.92% | 13.02% | -4.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 15.13% | -3.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.82% | 21.51% | -9.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 19.32% | -4.80% |
IASP.L vs. IPRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IASP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IPRP.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IASP.L vs. IPRP.L - Dividend Comparison
IASP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than IPRP.L's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IASP.L iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
IPRP.L iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF | 3.34% | 3.32% | 3.30% | 3.05% | 4.90% | 2.47% | 2.96% | 3.46% | 3.70% | 3.20% | 3.07% | 3.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IASP.L and IPRP.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IPRP.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IPRP.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IASP.L.
IASP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Asia TR USD, while IPRP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IASP.L and 0.40% for IPRP.L.
Find the right allocation for IASP.L and IPRP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer