IASP.L vs. EICOX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IASP.L (iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF) and EICOX (Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund) are both funds - IASP.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Asia TR USD, while EICOX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, IASP.L returned 2.46%/yr vs 13.51%/yr for EICOX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IASP.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for EICOX.

Performance

IASP.L vs. EICOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) and Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IASP.L is traded in GBp, while EICOX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EICOX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IASP.L achieves a -6.42% return, which is significantly lower than EICOX's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, IASP.L has underperformed EICOX with an annualized return of 2.46%, while EICOX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.51% annualized return.

IASP.L

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -5.73%
• YTD: -6.42%
• 6M: -5.32%
• 1Y: 6.00%
• 3Y*: 1.02%
• 5Y*: -1.54%
• 10Y*: 2.46%

EICOX

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 20.41%
• 6M: 22.37%
• 1Y: 42.07%
• 3Y*: 22.40%
• 5Y*: 15.88%
• 10Y*: 13.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IASP.L vs. EICOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IASP.L iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF	-6.42%	21.55%	-8.28%	-7.53%	-1.49%	5.66%	-11.71%	12.30%	3.64%	7.73%
EICOX Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund	20.41%	23.73%	13.95%	19.49%	-4.44%	14.50%	10.13%	8.31%	-9.51%	20.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IASP.L and EICOX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.47

The correlation between IASP.L and EICOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IASP.L vs. EICOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IASP.L

IASP.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
IASP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
IASP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
IASP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 17
IASP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
IASP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 15

EICOX

EICOX Risk / Return Rank: 76
EICOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
EICOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EICOX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
EICOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
EICOX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IASP.L vs. EICOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) and Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IASP.L	EICOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	2.75	-2.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	3.44	-2.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.56	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.39	3.63	-3.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.17	13.26	-12.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IASP.L vs. EICOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IASP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the EICOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IASP.L and EICOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IASP.L	EICOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49	2.75	-2.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	1.26	-1.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17	0.99	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.81	-0.78

Drawdowns

IASP.L vs. EICOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IASP.L drawdown since its inception was -74.24%, which is greater than EICOX's maximum drawdown of -27.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IASP.L and EICOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IASP.L	EICOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.24%	-27.50%	-46.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.92%	-11.69%	-2.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.92%	-12.73%	-1.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.02%	-12.73%	-9.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.82%	-27.50%	-8.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.33%	-5.73%	-12.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.67%	-5.34%	-20.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.66%	3.20%	+1.46%

Volatility

IASP.L vs. EICOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IASP.L) is 3.28%, while Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that IASP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EICOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IASP.L	EICOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	8.15%	-4.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.83%	13.90%	-5.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.20%	15.50%	-4.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.68%	12.69%	-1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.42%	13.74%	+0.68%

IASP.L vs. EICOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IASP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than EICOX's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

IASP.L vs. EICOX - Dividend Comparison

IASP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than EICOX's 3.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EICOX Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund	3.09%	3.68%	2.02%	1.95%	5.72%	2.71%	0.10%	2.00%	2.95%	0.00%	0.59%	2.35%
IASP.L iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF	3.77%	3.45%	4.16%	3.84%	3.63%	3.00%	3.42%	3.07%	3.30%	3.13%	2.82%	3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IASP.L and EICOX in my portfolio?

IASP.L and EICOX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.