IASMX vs. FPBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund (IASMX) and Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX).
IASMX is managed by Guinness Atkinson. It was launched on Apr 28, 1996. FPBFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 1, 1986.
Performance
IASMX vs. FPBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IASMX vs. FPBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IASMX Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund | -1.19% | 29.64% | 4.38% | 5.95% | -28.04% | -6.46% | 26.02% | 29.32% | -17.58% | 47.12% |
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund | 0.75% | 37.15% | 9.26% | 14.07% | -23.71% | 2.28% | 32.92% | 32.21% | -18.08% | 40.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IASMX achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than FPBFX's 0.75% return. Over the past 10 years, IASMX has underperformed FPBFX with an annualized return of 7.59%, while FPBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.92% annualized return.
IASMX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -8.38%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -2.18%
- 1Y
- 26.03%
- 3Y*
- 9.95%
- 5Y*
- -1.62%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
FPBFX
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -11.66%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 34.14%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IASMX vs. FPBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IASMX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FPBFX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IASMX vs. FPBFX — Risk / Return Rank
IASMX
FPBFX
IASMX vs. FPBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund (IASMX) and Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IASMX | FPBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 1.54 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 2.04 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.30 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 2.21 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.38 | 8.61 | -2.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IASMX | FPBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 1.54 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.31 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.63 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.41 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between IASMX and FPBFX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IASMX vs. FPBFX - Dividend Comparison
IASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, less than FPBFX's 8.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IASMX Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund | 7.01% | 6.92% | 1.51% | 1.16% | 3.40% | 9.14% | 5.78% | 6.61% | 12.82% | 0.90% | 1.44% | 1.18% |
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund | 8.13% | 8.19% | 5.99% | 5.36% | 8.76% | 14.97% | 4.45% | 0.75% | 10.88% | 4.36% | 2.38% | 3.61% |
Drawdowns
IASMX vs. FPBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IASMX drawdown since its inception was -76.53%, which is greater than FPBFX's maximum drawdown of -69.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IASMX and FPBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IASMX | FPBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.53% | -69.06% | -7.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.27% | -13.21% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.08% | -37.97% | -11.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.51% | -39.85% | -12.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.06% | -12.25% | -5.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.36% | -17.65% | -15.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 3.50% | +0.07% |
Volatility
IASMX vs. FPBFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund (IASMX) is 6.81%, while Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) has a volatility of 9.35%. This indicates that IASMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IASMX | FPBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.81% | 9.35% | -2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 15.63% | -3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.10% | 21.31% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 18.72% | +2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 17.46% | +3.15% |