IAPR vs. SFLR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IAPR (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April) and SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAPR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the MSCI EAFE, while SFLR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. IAPR is passively managed, while SFLR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IAPR returned 10.41%/yr vs 14.80%/yr for SFLR. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IAPR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SFLR.

Performance

IAPR vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAPR achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly higher than SFLR's 3.43% return.

IAPR

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 7.08%
• 6M: 7.12%
• 1Y: 14.51%
• 3Y*: 10.41%
• 5Y*: 5.11%
• 10Y*: —

SFLR

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 3.43%
• 6M: 3.07%
• 1Y: 15.38%
• 3Y*: 14.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAPR vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IAPR Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April	7.08%	15.51%	3.76%	7.67%	4.23%
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF	3.43%	13.29%	19.99%	21.20%	0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IAPR and SFLR is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2022	0.61

The correlation between IAPR and SFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IAPR vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAPR

IAPR Risk / Return Rank: 83
IAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
IAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
IAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 78
IAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
IAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

SFLR

SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 49
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAPR vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IAPR	SFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	1.59	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	2.15	+1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.30	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.68	2.27	+3.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.78	8.91	+12.87

IAPR vs. SFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAPR Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the SFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAPR and SFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IAPR vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAPR drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, which is greater than SFLR's maximum drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAPR and SFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	IAPR	SFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.73%	-12.13%	-5.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.56%	-6.79%	+4.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.46%	-12.13%	+2.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-2.61%	+1.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.84%	-1.75%	-2.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	1.73%	-1.06%

Volatility

IAPR vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) is 2.69%, while Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that IAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IAPR	SFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.69%	4.37%	-1.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.86%	7.51%	-1.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.99%	9.72%	-2.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.91%	10.32%	-1.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.79%	10.32%	-1.53%

IAPR vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

IAPR vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison

IAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IAPR Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF	0.33%	0.33%	0.42%	1.16%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IAPR and SFLR in my portfolio?

IAPR and SFLR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IAPR or SFLR?

SFLR has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to IAPR (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAPR dropped -17.73% vs SFLR's -12.13%.

Which ETF is better, IAPR or SFLR?

On 3-year performance, SFLR leads with 14.80% vs 10.41% for IAPR. On fees, IAPR is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, IAPR has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IAPR or SFLR?

Over the 3-year period, SFLR has performed better with a 14.80% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IAPR or SFLR?

IAPR is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IAPR or SFLR?

SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for IAPR.

What is the main difference between IAPR and SFLR?

IAPR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SFLR is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IAPR and 0.89% for SFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.