IAPR vs. FFEB
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB).
IAPR and FFEB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IAPR is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE. It was launched on Mar 31, 2021. FFEB is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Feb 21, 2020.
Performance
IAPR vs. FFEB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IAPR vs. FFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAPR Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April | 2.69% | 15.51% | 3.76% | 7.67% | -7.61% | 2.74% |
FFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February | -1.36% | 13.76% | 16.64% | 19.95% | -7.51% | 10.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAPR achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly higher than FFEB's -1.36% return.
IAPR
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFEB
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- -3.34%
- YTD
- -1.36%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 14.47%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.99%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IAPR vs. FFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IAPR and FFEB have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Return for Risk
IAPR vs. FFEB — Risk / Return Rank
IAPR
FFEB
IAPR vs. FFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAPR | FFEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 1.17 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.62 | 1.76 | +0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.30 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 1.72 | +0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.34 | 9.15 | +6.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAPR | FFEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.17 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.77 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between IAPR and FFEB is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IAPR vs. FFEB - Dividend Comparison
Neither IAPR nor FFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IAPR vs. FFEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAPR drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, smaller than the maximum FFEB drawdown of -22.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAPR and FFEB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAPR | FFEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.73% | -22.81% | +5.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -8.65% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.87% | +3.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -2.46% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 1.62% | -0.70% |
Volatility
IAPR vs. FFEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) is 2.78%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that IAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IAPR | FFEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 3.72% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.92% | 5.65% | -1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.38% | 12.39% | -4.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.70% | 10.88% | -2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.70% | 13.90% | -5.20% |