IAPR vs. DAUG
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG).
IAPR and DAUG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IAPR is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE. It was launched on Mar 31, 2021. DAUG is a passively managed fund by FT Vest that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Nov 6, 2019. Both IAPR and DAUG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IAPR vs. DAUG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IAPR vs. DAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAPR Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April | 2.69% | 15.51% | 3.76% | 7.67% | -7.61% | 2.74% |
DAUG FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August | -1.78% | 11.75% | 12.00% | 13.85% | -11.95% | 4.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAPR achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly higher than DAUG's -1.78% return.
IAPR
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DAUG
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -2.41%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 6M
- -0.17%
- 1Y
- 12.26%
- 3Y*
- 10.68%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IAPR vs. DAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IAPR and DAUG have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Return for Risk
IAPR vs. DAUG — Risk / Return Rank
IAPR
DAUG
IAPR vs. DAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAPR | DAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 1.27 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.62 | 1.89 | +0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.31 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 1.84 | +0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.34 | 9.69 | +5.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAPR | DAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.27 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.63 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between IAPR and DAUG is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IAPR vs. DAUG - Dividend Comparison
Neither IAPR nor DAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IAPR vs. DAUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAPR drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, which is greater than DAUG's maximum drawdown of -15.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAPR and DAUG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAPR | DAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.73% | -15.34% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -6.90% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.87% | +2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -2.89% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 1.31% | -0.39% |
Volatility
IAPR vs. DAUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) is 2.78%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that IAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IAPR | DAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 2.99% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.92% | 4.53% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.38% | 9.68% | -1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.70% | 8.01% | +0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.70% | 9.36% | -0.66% |