PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAPR vs. DAUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IAPR vs. DAUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IAPR vs. DAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IAPR
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April
2.69%15.51%3.76%7.67%-7.61%2.74%
DAUG
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August
-1.78%11.75%12.00%13.85%-11.95%4.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAPR achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly higher than DAUG's -1.78% return.


IAPR

1D
1.25%
1M
0.70%
YTD
2.69%
6M
5.32%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
8.92%
5Y*
10Y*

DAUG

1D
1.57%
1M
-2.41%
YTD
-1.78%
6M
-0.17%
1Y
12.26%
3Y*
10.68%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IAPR vs. DAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IAPR and DAUG have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Return for Risk

IAPR vs. DAUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAPR
IAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

DAUG
DAUG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAPR vs. DAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAPRDAUGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

1.27

+0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.62

1.89

+0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.31

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.84

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.34

9.69

+5.65

IAPR vs. DAUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAPR Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the DAUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAPR and DAUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAPRDAUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.27

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.63

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between IAPR and DAUG is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IAPR vs. DAUG - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAPR nor DAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IAPR vs. DAUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAPR drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, which is greater than DAUG's maximum drawdown of -15.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAPR and DAUG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IAPRDAUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.73%

-15.34%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.08%

-6.90%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.87%

+2.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-2.89%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

1.31%

-0.39%

Volatility

IAPR vs. DAUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) is 2.78%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that IAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IAPRDAUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.99%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.92%

4.53%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.38%

9.68%

-1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.70%

8.01%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.70%

9.36%

-0.66%