IAI vs. FBDC
IAI (iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF) and FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. IAI is passively managed, while FBDC is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IAI charges 0.38%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for FBDC.
Performance
IAI vs. FBDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAI achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly higher than FBDC's -10.39% return.
IAI
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 4.12%
- 6M
- 2.06%
- 1Y
- 17.16%
- 3Y*
- 29.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.88%
- 10Y*
- 19.81%
FBDC
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- -10.39%
- 6M
- -8.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAI vs. FBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IAI iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF | 4.12% | 8.15% |
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | -10.39% | -2.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAI and FBDC is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAI vs. FBDC — Risk / Return Rank
IAI
FBDC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IAI vs. FBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAI | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.96 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAI vs. FBDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAI drawdown since its inception was -75.46%, which is greater than FBDC's maximum drawdown of -20.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAI and FBDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAI | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.46% | -20.60% | -54.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -18.04% | +16.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.61% | -10.44% | -12.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.80% | — | — |
Volatility
IAI vs. FBDC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAI | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.29% | 18.00% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 18.00% | +3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 18.00% | +4.75% |
IAI vs. FBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FBDC's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAI vs. FBDC - Dividend Comparison
IAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than FBDC's 11.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | 11.63% | 5.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAI iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF | 1.10% | 0.95% | 1.05% | 1.80% | 2.14% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.52% | 1.58% | 1.37% | 1.49% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAI and FBDC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IAI is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IAI is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.
FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.63%, compared with 1.10% for IAI.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IAI and 1.35% for FBDC.
Find the right allocation for IAI and FBDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer