PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAGIX vs. DGTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAGIX vs. DGTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Solution Moderately Aggressive Portfolio (IAGIX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAGIX achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly higher than DGTSX's 4.30% return. Over the past 10 years, IAGIX has outperformed DGTSX with an annualized return of 10.11%, while DGTSX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.21% annualized return.


IAGIX

1D
0.24%
1M
4.57%
YTD
9.77%
6M
9.96%
1Y
22.13%
3Y*
16.76%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
10.11%

DGTSX

1D
0.14%
1M
1.60%
YTD
4.30%
6M
4.61%
1Y
10.24%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
5.26%
10Y*
5.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAGIX vs. DGTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAGIX
Voya Solution Moderately Aggressive Portfolio
9.77%15.06%15.10%18.81%-18.40%17.43%14.27%22.89%-9.00%18.50%
DGTSX
DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio
4.30%8.39%7.43%8.93%-8.06%10.20%7.29%9.80%-1.85%5.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IAGIX and DGTSX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2010

0.91

The correlation between IAGIX and DGTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAGIX vs. DGTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAGIX
IAGIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IAGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IAGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

DGTSX
DGTSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DGTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DGTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAGIX vs. DGTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Solution Moderately Aggressive Portfolio (IAGIX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAGIXDGTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.64

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

3.94

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.95

17.59

-1.64

IAGIX vs. DGTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAGIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the DGTSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAGIX and DGTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAGIXDGTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

3.07

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.89

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

1.00

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.94

-0.27

Drawdowns

IAGIX vs. DGTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAGIX drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, which is greater than DGTSX's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAGIX and DGTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAGIXDGTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.68%

-16.71%

-15.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.68%

-2.64%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.34%

-7.46%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

-11.26%

-13.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

-11.26%

-21.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-1.65%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

0.59%

+0.92%

Volatility

IAGIX vs. DGTSX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Solution Moderately Aggressive Portfolio (IAGIX) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) at 1.14%. This indicates that IAGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAGIXDGTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

1.14%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

2.73%

+5.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

3.39%

+6.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.62%

5.96%

+7.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

5.23%

+9.41%

IAGIX vs. DGTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAGIX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than DGTSX's 0.24% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IAGIX vs. DGTSX - Dividend Comparison

IAGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.61%, more than DGTSX's 5.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGTSX
DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio
5.70%5.54%7.28%4.75%2.77%7.62%2.12%2.57%2.99%1.25%1.26%1.50%
IAGIX
Voya Solution Moderately Aggressive Portfolio
24.61%27.02%2.43%9.29%21.89%1.73%8.74%10.60%7.73%2.60%2.83%20.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


IAGIX and DGTSX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAGIX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to DGTSX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAGIX dropped -32.68% vs DGTSX's -16.71%.

DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAGIX and DGTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer