IAGG vs. NXUS
IAGG (iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF) and NXUS (Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Global Bonds funds - IAGG tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex USD 10% Issuer Capped (Hedged) Index while NXUS tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged). Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IAGG charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for NXUS.
Performance
IAGG vs. NXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAGG achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly higher than NXUS's 1.04% return.
IAGG
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 2.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 1.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.19%
NXUS
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAGG vs. NXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IAGG iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.48% | 0.52% |
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.04% | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAGG and NXUS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAGG vs. NXUS — Risk / Return Rank
IAGG
NXUS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IAGG vs. NXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG) and Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAGG | NXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAGG vs. NXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAGG drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, which is greater than NXUS's maximum drawdown of -2.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAGG and NXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAGG | NXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -2.81% | -11.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -0.78% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -0.91% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | — | — |
Volatility
IAGG vs. NXUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAGG | NXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87% | 3.74% | -0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.51% | 3.74% | +0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.05% | 3.74% | +0.31% |
IAGG vs. NXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAGG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NXUS's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IAGG vs. NXUS - Dividend Comparison
IAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than NXUS's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAGG iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.64% | 3.08% | 4.28% | 3.55% | 2.27% | 1.16% | 1.95% | 2.82% | 3.02% | 1.74% | 1.56% | 0.13% |
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.66% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAGG and NXUS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IAGG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IAGG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for NXUS.
IAGG has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 1.66% for NXUS.
IAGG tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex USD 10% Issuer Capped (Hedged) Index, while NXUS tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IAGG and 0.08% for NXUS.
Find the right allocation for IAGG and NXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer