IAGG vs. CEMB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB).
IAGG and CEMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IAGG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Global Aggregate ex USD 10% Issuer Capped (Hedged) Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2015. CEMB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JP Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified. It was launched on Apr 17, 2012. Both IAGG and CEMB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IAGG or CEMB.
Correlation
The correlation between IAGG and CEMB is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IAGG vs. CEMB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IAGG:
2.02
CEMB:
1.64
IAGG:
3.02
CEMB:
2.21
IAGG:
1.37
CEMB:
1.35
IAGG:
1.09
CEMB:
1.07
IAGG:
11.23
CEMB:
7.79
IAGG:
0.59%
CEMB:
0.96%
IAGG:
3.28%
CEMB:
4.54%
IAGG:
-13.88%
CEMB:
-20.84%
IAGG:
-0.06%
CEMB:
-0.71%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAGG achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than CEMB's 2.10% return.
IAGG
1.52%
1.69%
2.32%
7.22%
0.74%
N/A
CEMB
2.10%
-0.41%
1.43%
7.92%
3.27%
3.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IAGG vs. CEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAGG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMB's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IAGG vs. CEMB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IAGG
CEMB
IAGG vs. CEMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IAGG vs. CEMB - Dividend Comparison
IAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, less than CEMB's 5.19% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAGG iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.21% | 4.28% | 3.55% | 2.28% | 1.16% | 1.95% | 2.82% | 3.02% | 1.74% | 1.56% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF | 5.19% | 5.11% | 4.77% | 4.29% | 3.51% | 3.86% | 4.19% | 4.66% | 4.06% | 4.26% | 4.76% | 4.23% |
Drawdowns
IAGG vs. CEMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAGG drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum CEMB drawdown of -20.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAGG and CEMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IAGG vs. CEMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG) is 0.77%, while iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that IAGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.