PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAG vs. BYRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IAG vs. BYRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAG achieves a -13.95% return, which is significantly higher than BYRN's -72.90% return. Over the past 10 years, IAG has outperformed BYRN with an annualized return of 10.35%, while BYRN has yielded a comparatively lower 6.61% annualized return.


IAG

1D
-2.54%
1M
-10.02%
6M
-21.95%
YTD
-13.95%
1Y
109.91%
3Y*
76.06%
5Y*
38.95%
10Y*
10.35%
ALL TIME*
5.33%

BYRN

1D
-0.22%
1M
-33.09%
6M
-66.81%
YTD
-72.90%
1Y
-79.51%
3Y*
9.14%
5Y*
-28.29%
10Y*
6.61%
ALL TIME*
3.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.54M$5.26M$3.58M
$76.33M$73.71M$89.43M

IAG vs. BYRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAG
IAMGOLD Corporation
-13.95%219.57%103.95%-1.94%-17.57%-14.71%-1.61%1.36%-36.88%51.43%
BYRN
Byrna Technologies Inc.
-72.90%-41.72%350.86%-18.49%-41.27%-7.93%663.16%26.67%7.14%-30.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IAG and BYRN is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2011

0.07

The correlation between IAG and BYRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.18 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IAG:

$8.20B

BYRN:

$103.25M

EPS

IAG:

$1.73

BYRN:

-$0.16

PS Ratio

IAG:

2.43

BYRN:

0.99

PB Ratio

IAG:

1.94

BYRN:

1.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

IAG:

$3.42B

BYRN:

$108.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IAG:

$1.64B

BYRN:

$57.17M

EBITDA (TTM)

IAG:

$1.97B

BYRN:

-$3.55M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAG vs. BYRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IAG
IAG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAG Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BYRN
BYRN Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BYRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYRN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BYRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYRN Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IAG vs. BYRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAGBYRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.75

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

-0.90

+3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.35

-1.44

+6.79

IAG vs. BYRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the BYRN Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAG and BYRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAG vs. BYRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAG drawdown since its inception was -95.55%, roughly equal to the maximum BYRN drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAG and BYRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAGBYRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.55%

-92.51%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.30%

-88.49%

+45.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.30%

-90.70%

+47.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.69%

-92.51%

+18.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.46%

-92.51%

+6.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.25%

-86.69%

+44.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.07%

-52.64%

-3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.61%

55.21%

-34.60%

Volatility

IAG vs. BYRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is 15.14%, while Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) has a volatility of 50.27%. This indicates that IAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAGBYRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.14%

50.27%

-35.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.40%

77.46%

-29.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.98%

82.35%

-19.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.60%

75.62%

-15.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.53%

96.48%

-37.95%

Dividends

IAG vs. BYRN - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAG nor BYRN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

IAG vs. BYRN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IAMGOLD Corporation and Byrna Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

IAG vs. BYRN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IAMGOLD Corporation and Byrna Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

IAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 570.70M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.

BYRN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.78M and revenue of 16.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.9%.

IAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 544.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.9%.

BYRN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of -12.85M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -78.4%.

IAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 379.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.

BYRN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a net income of -10.09M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in a net margin of -61.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IAG and BYRN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BYRN has higher volatility (50.27%) compared to IAG (15.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAG dropped -95.55% vs BYRN's -92.51%.

IAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAG and BYRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer