PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IAEX.L vs. HMCX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IAEX.L vs. HMCX.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IAEX.L (iShares AEX UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) and HMCX.L (HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP) are both Europe Equities funds - IAEX.L tracks the Euronext AEX All Share TR EUR while HMCX.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IAEX.L returned 12.93%/yr vs 2.70%/yr for HMCX.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IAEX.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HMCX.L.

Performance

IAEX.L vs. HMCX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares AEX UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IAEX.L) and HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAEX.L achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly higher than HMCX.L's 4.02% return. Over the past 10 years, IAEX.L has outperformed HMCX.L with an annualized return of 12.93%, while HMCX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.70% annualized return.

IAEX.L

1D
0.41%
1M
4.18%
YTD
10.82%
6M
10.84%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
12.93%

HMCX.L

1D
0.46%
1M
4.18%
YTD
4.02%
6M
5.81%
1Y
9.84%
3Y*
6.41%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
2.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAEX.L vs. HMCX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAEX.L
iShares AEX UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		10.82%16.56%9.02%14.52%-5.93%21.34%11.18%22.17%-7.39%21.31%
HMCX.L
HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP		4.02%8.36%3.93%4.54%-19.69%13.90%-7.19%25.24%-15.88%14.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IAEX.L and HMCX.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2010

0.66

The correlation between IAEX.L and HMCX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

IAEX.L vs. HMCX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IAEX.L
HMCX.L

Technology

27.1%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

18.4%
6.2%

Financial Services

15.3%
19.5%

Energy

13.5%
2.5%

Industrials

8.3%
19.9%

Basic Materials

5.9%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
13.4%

Communication Services

4.2%
5.9%

Healthcare

1.9%
4.4%

Real Estate

0.5%
9.5%

Utilities

-

3.0%

Technology

IAEX.L
27.1%
HMCX.L
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

IAEX.L
18.4%
HMCX.L
6.2%

Financial Services

IAEX.L
15.3%
HMCX.L
19.5%

Energy

IAEX.L
13.5%
HMCX.L
2.5%

Industrials

IAEX.L
8.3%
HMCX.L
19.9%

Basic Materials

IAEX.L
5.9%
HMCX.L
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IAEX.L
5.0%
HMCX.L
13.4%

Communication Services

IAEX.L
4.2%
HMCX.L
5.9%

Healthcare

IAEX.L
1.9%
HMCX.L
4.4%

Real Estate

IAEX.L
0.5%
HMCX.L
9.5%

Utilities

IAEX.L

-

HMCX.L
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares AEX UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)

HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP

Often compared with IAEX.L:
IAEX.L vs. CSPX.LIAEX.L vs. CNDX.LIAEX.L vs. ^GSPCIAEX.L vs. VOOIAEX.L vs. VGTIAEX.L vs. VUSA.LIAEX.L vs. IUSA.L
Often compared with HMCX.L:
HMCX.L vs. XLKHMCX.L vs. QQQHMCX.L vs. ^GSPCHMCX.L vs. UBSHMCX.L vs. HUKX.LHMCX.L vs. SPMOHMCX.L vs. SWPPX

Return for Risk

IAEX.L vs. HMCX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IAEX.L
IAEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IAEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IAEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
HMCX.L
HMCX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
HMCX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMCX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMCX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HMCX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMCX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAEX.L vs. HMCX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AEX UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IAEX.L) and HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IAEX.LHMCX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.53
0.75

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.16
1.18

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.14

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

0.80

+1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

2.76

+4.70

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IAEX.L vs. HMCX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAEX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the HMCX.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAEX.L and HMCX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IAEX.LHMCX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

0.75

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.00

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.17

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.30

-0.06

Drawdowns

IAEX.L vs. HMCX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAEX.L drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, which is greater than HMCX.L's maximum drawdown of -41.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAEX.L and HMCX.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IAEX.LHMCX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.69%

-41.87%

-21.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.50%

-12.19%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.75%

-17.36%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.90%

-31.75%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.83%

-41.87%

+13.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.53%

+5.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.55%

-9.50%

-7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

3.56%

-0.97%

Volatility

IAEX.L vs. HMCX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares AEX UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IAEX.L) is 3.47%, while HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that IAEX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMCX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IAEX.LHMCX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

4.57%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

11.16%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

13.15%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

15.08%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

16.17%

+1.05%

IAEX.L vs. HMCX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAEX.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than HMCX.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IAEX.L vs. HMCX.L - Dividend Comparison

IAEX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than HMCX.L's 0.04% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMCX.L
HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP		0.04%0.04%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%
IAEX.L
iShares AEX UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		2.12%2.37%2.57%2.43%2.56%1.84%1.57%3.29%3.54%3.09%3.34%3.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

IAEX.L and HMCX.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IAEX.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IAEX.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HMCX.L.

IAEX.L tracks Euronext AEX All Share TR EUR, while HMCX.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IAEX.L and 0.35% for HMCX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAEX.L and HMCX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer