PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IACIX vs. NMAVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IACIX vs. NMAVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VY American Century Small-Mid Cap Value Portfolio (IACIX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IACIX achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly higher than NMAVX's 5.95% return. Over the past 10 years, IACIX has outperformed NMAVX with an annualized return of 9.39%, while NMAVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.35% annualized return.


IACIX

1D
1.24%
1M
1.24%
YTD
10.72%
6M
10.42%
1Y
19.31%
3Y*
11.63%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
9.39%

NMAVX

1D
1.07%
1M
2.25%
YTD
5.95%
6M
6.11%
1Y
13.30%
3Y*
5.48%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
7.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IACIX vs. NMAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IACIX
VY American Century Small-Mid Cap Value Portfolio
10.72%5.24%8.21%9.01%-5.23%27.57%3.85%30.82%-14.11%11.47%
NMAVX
Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund
5.95%1.91%5.20%6.44%-5.26%11.10%4.41%30.71%-5.44%14.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IACIX and NMAVX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2014

0.87

The correlation between IACIX and NMAVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IACIX vs. NMAVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IACIX
IACIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IACIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IACIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IACIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IACIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IACIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

NMAVX
NMAVX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
NMAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
NMAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IACIX vs. NMAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VY American Century Small-Mid Cap Value Portfolio (IACIX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IACIXNMAVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.20

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

1.32

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.81

3.37

+4.44

IACIX vs. NMAVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IACIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the NMAVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IACIX and NMAVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IACIXNMAVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.13

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.22

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.49

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.52

-0.06

Drawdowns

IACIX vs. NMAVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IACIX drawdown since its inception was -53.26%, which is greater than NMAVX's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IACIX and NMAVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IACIXNMAVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.26%

-30.93%

-22.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-9.80%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-18.40%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.18%

-18.40%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.85%

-30.93%

-9.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.28%

+4.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

-3.80%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

3.84%

-1.14%

Volatility

IACIX vs. NMAVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VY American Century Small-Mid Cap Value Portfolio (IACIX) is 3.01%, while Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that IACIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IACIXNMAVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

3.56%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

8.14%

+1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.54%

11.54%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

13.34%

+3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

15.04%

+4.21%

IACIX vs. NMAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IACIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than NMAVX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

IACIX vs. NMAVX - Dividend Comparison

IACIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, more than NMAVX's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IACIX
VY American Century Small-Mid Cap Value Portfolio
8.45%9.35%4.70%15.47%22.39%0.94%1.97%11.26%14.56%5.11%9.82%25.57%
NMAVX
Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund
0.94%1.00%7.55%1.78%9.05%11.98%0.61%5.91%7.16%7.05%1.83%4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


IACIX and NMAVX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMAVX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to IACIX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IACIX dropped -53.26% vs NMAVX's -30.93%.

IACIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IACIX and NMAVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer