PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAAAX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAAAX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund (IAAAX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IAAAX having a 7.63% return and FRGAX slightly lower at 7.37%.


IAAAX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
7.63%
6M
6.52%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
18.75%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
11.27%

FRGAX

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
7.37%
6M
6.61%
1Y
18.12%
3Y*
15.32%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAAAX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IAAAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund
7.63%21.45%17.37%20.04%-0.77%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
7.37%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between IAAAX and FRGAX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022

0.96

The correlation between IAAAX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAAAX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAAAX
IAAAX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
IAAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IAAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAAAX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund (IAAAX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAAAXFRGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.59

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.36

11.22

-1.86

IAAAX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAAAX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAAAX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAAAX drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAAAX and FRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAAAXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.57%

-11.77%

-44.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-7.03%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.90%

-11.77%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-1.83%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.51%

-1.58%

-7.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

1.61%

+0.64%

Volatility

IAAAX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund (IAAAX) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) at 3.98%. This indicates that IAAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAAAXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

3.98%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

7.98%

+3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.75%

9.66%

+4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

10.41%

+6.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.85%

10.41%

+6.44%

IAAAX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAAAX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAAAX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

IAAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than FRGAX's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.87%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IAAAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund
6.70%7.21%5.16%2.79%8.74%8.25%4.13%9.02%19.05%11.01%8.16%9.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, IAAAX and FRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IAAAX has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to FRGAX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAAAX dropped -56.57% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

FRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAAAX and FRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer