I500.L vs. LSPX.L
I500.L (iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF) and LSPX.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD) are both S&P 500 funds - I500.L tracks the S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD) while LSPX.L tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, I500.L returned 15.15%/yr vs 15.13%/yr for LSPX.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. I500.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for LSPX.L.
Performance
I500.L vs. LSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
I500.L is traded in GBP, while LSPX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LSPX.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with I500.L at 10.61% and LSPX.L at 10.61%.
I500.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- —
LSPX.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.13%
- 10Y*
- 16.37%
I500.L vs. LSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I500.L iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF | 10.61% | 9.56% | 27.57% | 20.04% | -8.74% | 31.23% | 5.72% |
LSPX.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 10.61% | 9.48% | 27.64% | 20.51% | -9.65% | 30.18% | 7.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between I500.L and LSPX.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between I500.L and LSPX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
I500.L vs. LSPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
I500.L
LSPX.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
I500.L
LSPX.L
Financial Services
I500.L
LSPX.L
Communication Services
I500.L
LSPX.L
Consumer Cyclical
I500.L
LSPX.L
Healthcare
I500.L
LSPX.L
Industrials
I500.L
LSPX.L
Consumer Defensive
I500.L
LSPX.L
Energy
I500.L
LSPX.L
Utilities
I500.L
LSPX.L
Real Estate
I500.L
LSPX.L
Basic Materials
I500.L
LSPX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
I500.L vs. LSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
I500.L
LSPX.L
I500.L vs. LSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| I500.L | LSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.52 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 4.06 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.23 | 14.65 | +0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| I500.L | LSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 2.80 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 1.09 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 1.30 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
I500.L vs. LSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum I500.L drawdown since its inception was -20.75%, smaller than the maximum LSPX.L drawdown of -25.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for I500.L and LSPX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| I500.L | LSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.75% | -25.47% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.08% | -7.22% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.75% | -21.10% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.75% | -21.10% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.24% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -3.29% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 2.00% | -0.08% |
Volatility
I500.L vs. LSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) have volatilities of 2.59% and 2.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| I500.L | LSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 2.58% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 7.13% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 10.50% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 14.53% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 17.05% | -2.75% |
I500.L vs. LSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
I500.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than LSPX.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
I500.L vs. LSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
I500.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I500.L iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSPX.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 0.91% | 1.00% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 2.06% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 1.70% | 1.97% | 1.72% | 1.87% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, I500.L and LSPX.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, I500.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
I500.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for LSPX.L.
I500.L tracks S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD), while LSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for I500.L and 0.09% for LSPX.L.
Find the right allocation for I500.L and LSPX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer