PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYZD vs. GDMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYZD vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYZD achieves a 2.51% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -4.13% return.


HYZD

1D
0.09%
1M
0.69%
YTD
2.51%
6M
3.22%
1Y
7.66%
3Y*
9.28%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
5.57%

GDMN

1D
-3.68%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
-4.13%
6M
2.73%
1Y
76.93%
3Y*
60.95%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYZD vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HYZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund
2.51%7.67%9.39%11.17%-2.35%1.09%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
-4.13%237.09%28.23%12.97%-14.62%5.11%

Correlation

The correlation between HYZD and GDMN is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021

0.13

The correlation between HYZD and GDMN shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HYZD vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYZD
GDMN

Energy

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

HYZD
100.0%
GDMN

-

Basic Materials

HYZD

-

GDMN
100.0%

Communication Services

HYZD

-

GDMN

-

Consumer Cyclical

HYZD

-

GDMN

-

Consumer Defensive

HYZD

-

GDMN

-

Financial Services

HYZD

-

GDMN

-

Healthcare

HYZD

-

GDMN

-

Industrials

HYZD

-

GDMN

-

Real Estate

HYZD

-

GDMN

-

Technology

HYZD

-

GDMN

-

Utilities

HYZD

-

GDMN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYZD vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYZD
HYZD Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HYZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYZD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HYZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYZD Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

GDMN
GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYZD vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYZDGDMNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.25

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

1.98

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.08

4.68

+12.41

HYZD vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYZD Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYZD and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYZDGDMNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.26

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.80

-0.30

Drawdowns

HYZD vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYZD drawdown since its inception was -25.66%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYZD and GDMN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYZDGDMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.66%

-52.82%

+27.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.91%

-39.03%

+37.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.85%

-39.03%

+33.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-37.06%

+37.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.20%

-18.89%

+16.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

16.51%

-16.06%

Volatility

HYZD vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) is 0.96%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 17.94%. This indicates that HYZD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYZDGDMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

17.94%

-16.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.35%

51.79%

-49.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15%

61.32%

-58.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.70%

47.59%

-40.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.57%

47.59%

-39.02%

HYZD vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYZD has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYZD vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

HYZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, more than GDMN's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
2.82%2.70%9.44%7.69%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund
5.89%6.05%6.08%5.94%5.14%4.02%5.13%5.50%5.58%4.94%5.07%4.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYZD and GDMN have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDMN has higher volatility (17.94%) compared to HYZD (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYZD dropped -25.66% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 60.95% vs 9.28% for HYZD. On fees, HYZD is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, HYZD has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 60.95% return vs 9.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYZD is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.

HYZD has the higher dividend yield at 5.89%, compared with 2.82% for GDMN.

HYZD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for HYZD and 0.45% for GDMN.

HYZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYZD and GDMN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer