HYXF vs. INFR
HYXF (iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYXF is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI US High Yield Corporate Choice ESG Screened, while INFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the RARE Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYXF returned 8.56%/yr vs 5.55%/yr for INFR. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYXF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for INFR.
Performance
HYXF vs. INFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYXF achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than INFR's 1.41% return.
HYXF
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 5.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- —
INFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYXF vs. INFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYXF iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.91% | 8.88% | 8.35% | 11.87% | -1.26% |
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 1.41% | 24.00% | -6.23% | 5.20% | -0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYXF and INFR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2022 | 0.46 |
The correlation between HYXF and INFR shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYXF vs. INFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYXF
INFR
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
HYXF
INFR
-
Basic Materials
HYXF
-
INFR
-
Consumer Cyclical
HYXF
-
INFR
-
Consumer Defensive
HYXF
-
INFR
-
Energy
HYXF
-
INFR
-
Financial Services
HYXF
-
INFR
-
Healthcare
HYXF
-
INFR
-
Industrials
HYXF
-
INFR
Real Estate
HYXF
-
INFR
Technology
HYXF
-
INFR
-
Utilities
HYXF
-
INFR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYXF vs. INFR — Risk / Return Rank
HYXF
INFR
HYXF vs. INFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYXF) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYXF | INFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 0.93 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 1.36 | +1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.21 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 1.28 | +1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 3.97 | +6.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYXF | INFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 0.93 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.46 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
HYXF vs. INFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYXF drawdown since its inception was -18.75%, roughly equal to the maximum INFR drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYXF and INFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYXF | INFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.75% | -19.28% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.57% | -6.43% | +3.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.81% | -18.55% | +13.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.70% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.58% | -4.93% | +2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 2.04% | -1.47% |
Volatility
HYXF vs. INFR - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYXF) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) at 0.00%. This indicates that HYXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYXF | INFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 0.00% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 3.79% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.78% | 9.00% | -5.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.04% | 14.26% | -6.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.32% | 14.26% | -5.94% |
HYXF vs. INFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYXF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYXF vs. INFR - Dividend Comparison
HYXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, more than INFR's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYXF iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.09% | 6.19% | 6.40% | 5.93% | 5.37% | 4.56% | 4.96% | 5.29% | 6.14% | 5.85% | 3.16% |
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 2.49% | 2.52% | 2.36% | 3.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYXF and INFR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYXF has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to INFR (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYXF dropped -18.75% vs INFR's -19.28%.
On 3-year performance, HYXF leads with 8.56% vs 5.55% for INFR. On fees, HYXF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, INFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HYXF has performed better with a 8.56% return vs 5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYXF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for INFR.
HYXF has the higher dividend yield at 6.09%, compared with 2.49% for INFR.
HYXF is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while INFR is Energy Equities. HYXF tracks Bloomberg MSCI US High Yield Corporate Choice ESG Screened, while INFR tracks RARE Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ClearBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HYXF and 0.59% for INFR.
HYXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYXF and INFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer