PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYUP vs. XHYF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HYUP vs. XHYF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) and BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF (XHYF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HYUP vs. XHYF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HYUP
Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF
-0.11%8.83%10.30%14.56%-8.76%
XHYF
BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF
-1.42%8.69%8.65%13.29%-7.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYUP achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than XHYF's -1.42% return.


HYUP

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
0.87%
1Y
7.74%
3Y*
9.66%
5Y*
4.28%
10Y*

XHYF

1D
0.41%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
-1.42%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
5.44%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HYUP vs. XHYF - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYUP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XHYF's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HYUP vs. XHYF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYUP
HYUP Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
HYUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYUP Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HYUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYUP Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

XHYF
XHYF Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XHYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHYF Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XHYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHYF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYUP vs. XHYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) and BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF (XHYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYUPXHYFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

1.16

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

1.74

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.25

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.51

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.32

6.45

+1.87

HYUP vs. XHYF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYUP Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the XHYF Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYUP and XHYF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYUPXHYFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

1.16

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.70

-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between HYUP and XHYF is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HYUP vs. XHYF - Dividend Comparison

HYUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, more than XHYF's 6.95% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HYUP
Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF
7.39%7.44%7.78%7.48%7.15%6.19%6.89%6.77%6.98%
XHYF
BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF
6.95%6.73%7.11%7.00%5.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HYUP vs. XHYF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYUP drawdown since its inception was -24.79%, which is greater than XHYF's maximum drawdown of -12.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYUP and XHYF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HYUPXHYFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.79%

-12.92%

-11.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.65%

-3.70%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-1.92%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-2.61%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.87%

+0.09%

Volatility

HYUP vs. XHYF - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) has a higher volatility of 2.41% compared to BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF (XHYF) at 1.61%. This indicates that HYUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HYUPXHYFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

1.61%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.25%

2.49%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.39%

4.73%

+1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.25%

7.22%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.83%

7.22%

+2.61%