PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYTR vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYTR vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYTR achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.17% return.


HYTR

1D
0.11%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.35%
6M
0.72%
1Y
5.23%
3Y*
6.52%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.00%
1M
3.39%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.02%
1Y
34.99%
3Y*
20.03%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYTR vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HYTR
CP High Yield Trend ETF
0.35%5.95%7.25%8.31%-11.29%2.75%-0.95%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-13.27%

Correlation

The correlation between HYTR and YCS is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2020

-0.24

The correlation between HYTR and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.39 (1 year) to -0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYTR vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYTR
HYTR Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
HYTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HYTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYTR vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYTRYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.38

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

4.23

-1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.61

13.22

-5.60

HYTR vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYTR and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYTRYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.06

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

1.12

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.33

-0.03

Drawdowns

HYTR vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYTR drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYTR and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYTRYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-49.56%

+36.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.28%

-8.30%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.93%

-23.05%

+18.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.25%

-27.32%

+14.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

0.00%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-19.93%

+15.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

2.65%

-1.96%

Volatility

HYTR vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) is 1.09%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.62%. This indicates that HYTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYTRYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

2.62%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

12.31%

-9.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66%

17.18%

-13.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.62%

21.09%

-15.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.86%

19.01%

-13.15%

HYTR vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYTR has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYTR vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

HYTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
HYTR
CP High Yield Trend ETF
5.70%5.78%5.55%5.43%1.24%3.70%3.05%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYTR and YCS have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to HYTR (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYTR dropped -13.25% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.54% vs 2.09% for HYTR. On fees, HYTR is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, HYTR has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.54% return vs 2.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYTR is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

HYTR has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

HYTR is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. HYTR tracks CP High Yield Trend Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Counterpoint Mutual Funds LLC and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HYTR and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYTR and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer