PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYTR vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYTR vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYTR achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 17.65% return.


HYTR

1D
0.05%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.31%
1Y
4.41%
3Y*
6.63%
5Y*
1.96%
10Y*

WNTR

1D
6.51%
1M
45.64%
YTD
17.65%
6M
21.49%
1Y
115.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYTR vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HYTR and WNTR is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYTR vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYTR
HYTR Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HYTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
HYTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYTR vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYTRWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

2.73

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.36

6.99

-0.63

HYTR vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYTR and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYTR vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYTR drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYTR and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYTRWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-42.65%

+29.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.28%

-42.65%

+40.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-4.02%

+3.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-20.87%

+16.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

16.66%

-15.96%

Volatility

HYTR vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) is 0.92%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.14%. This indicates that HYTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYTRWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

18.14%

-17.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.70%

46.41%

-43.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51%

53.16%

-49.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.63%

53.31%

-47.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.84%

53.31%

-47.47%

HYTR vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYTR has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYTR vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

HYTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, less than WNTR's 94.34% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
HYTR
CP High Yield Trend ETF
5.74%5.78%5.55%5.43%1.24%3.70%3.05%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
94.34%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYTR and WNTR have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (18.14%) compared to HYTR (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYTR dropped -13.25% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 115.98% vs 4.41% for HYTR. On fees, HYTR is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, HYTR has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 115.98% return vs 4.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYTR is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 94.34%, compared with 5.74% for HYTR.

HYTR is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Counterpoint Mutual Funds LLC and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HYTR and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYTR and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer