PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HYTR vs. LDRH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HYTR vs. LDRH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HYTR (CP High Yield Trend ETF) and LDRH (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - HYTR tracks the CP High Yield Trend Index while LDRH tracks the BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HYTR returned 5.23% vs 6.30% for LDRH. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HYTR charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for LDRH.

Performance

HYTR vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYTR achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than LDRH's 1.88% return.

HYTR

1D
0.11%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.35%
6M
0.72%
1Y
5.23%
3Y*
6.52%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*
—

LDRH

1D
0.08%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.88%
6M
2.45%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYTR vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
HYTR
CP High Yield Trend ETF		0.35%5.95%-0.53%
LDRH
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF		1.88%7.18%0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between HYTR and LDRH is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024

0.84

The correlation between HYTR and LDRH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

HYTR vs. LDRH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HYTR
LDRH

Energy

90.3%
100.0%

Technology

9.3%

-

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

HYTR
90.3%
LDRH
100.0%

Technology

HYTR
9.3%
LDRH

-

Real Estate

HYTR
0.5%
LDRH

-

Basic Materials

HYTR

-

LDRH

-

Communication Services

HYTR

-

LDRH

-

Consumer Cyclical

HYTR

-

LDRH

-

Consumer Defensive

HYTR

-

LDRH

-

Financial Services

HYTR

-

LDRH

-

Healthcare

HYTR

-

LDRH

-

Industrials

HYTR

-

LDRH

-

Utilities

HYTR

-

LDRH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CP High Yield Trend ETF

iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF

Often compared with HYTR:
HYTR vs. SGOVHYTR vs. KYNHYTR vs. SPHYHYTR vs. BSTHYTR vs. SPYDHYTR vs. USHYHYTR vs. VOO
Often compared with LDRH:
LDRH vs. IBHELDRH vs. HYBLLDRH vs. SPHYLDRH vs. HYSLDRH vs. VGHYLDRH vs. IBHGLDRH vs. XHYF

Return for Risk

HYTR vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HYTR
HYTR Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
HYTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HYTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
LDRH
LDRH Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LDRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYTR vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HYTRLDRHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.44
2.43

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.10
3.92

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.48

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

5.14

-2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.61

21.43

-13.81

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HYTR vs. LDRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the LDRH Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYTR and LDRH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HYTRLDRHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.43

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

1.70

-1.41

Drawdowns

HYTR vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYTR drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, which is greater than LDRH's maximum drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYTR and LDRH.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HYTRLDRHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-3.17%

-10.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.28%

-1.23%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.93%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.25%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.12%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-0.24%

-3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

0.30%

+0.39%

Volatility

HYTR vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison

CP High Yield Trend ETF (HYTR) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) at 0.69%. This indicates that HYTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HYTRLDRHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.69%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

1.97%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66%

2.61%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.62%

3.51%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.86%

3.51%

+2.35%

HYTR vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYTR has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

HYTR vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison

HYTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, less than LDRH's 6.99% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
HYTR
CP High Yield Trend ETF		5.70%5.78%5.55%5.43%1.24%3.70%3.05%
LDRH
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF		6.99%6.41%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

HYTR and LDRH have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYTR has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to LDRH (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYTR dropped -13.25% vs LDRH's -3.17%.

On 1-year performance, LDRH leads with 6.30% vs 5.23% for HYTR. On fees, LDRH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LDRH has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LDRH has performed better with a 6.30% return vs 5.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LDRH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HYTR.

LDRH has the higher dividend yield at 6.99%, compared with 5.70% for HYTR.

HYTR tracks CP High Yield Trend Index, while LDRH tracks BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder Index. They also come from different issuers: Counterpoint Mutual Funds LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HYTR and 0.35% for LDRH.

LDRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYTR and LDRH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer