PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYTI vs. PIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYTI vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYTI achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 25.62% return.


HYTI

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.74%
6M
2.02%
1Y
6.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PIT

1D
-1.32%
1M
-11.78%
YTD
25.62%
6M
23.58%
1Y
39.64%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYTI vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HYTI and PIT is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYTI vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYTI
HYTI Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HYTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYTI Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HYTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

PIT
PIT Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYTI vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYTIPITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.62

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.78

10.88

-0.10

HYTI vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYTI Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYTI and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYTI vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYTI drawdown since its inception was -4.47%, smaller than the maximum PIT drawdown of -15.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYTI and PIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYTIPITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-15.19%

+10.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.38%

-15.19%

+12.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-15.19%

+14.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.45%

-4.08%

+3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

3.66%

-3.10%

Volatility

HYTI vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) is 1.06%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that HYTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYTIPITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

4.72%

-3.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

19.40%

-16.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.86%

21.66%

-17.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.17%

17.50%

-12.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.17%

17.50%

-12.33%

HYTI vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYTI vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

HYTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.41%, more than PIT's 7.10% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HYTI
FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF
10.41%8.10%0.00%0.00%
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
7.10%8.92%3.59%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYTI and PIT have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIT has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to HYTI (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYTI dropped -4.47% vs PIT's -15.19%.

On 1-year performance, PIT leads with 39.64% vs 6.07% for HYTI. On fees, PIT is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, HYTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PIT has performed better with a 39.64% return vs 6.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PIT is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HYTI.

HYTI has the higher dividend yield at 10.41%, compared with 7.10% for PIT.

HYTI is categorized as Derivative Income, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HYTI and 0.55% for PIT.

PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYTI and PIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer